forgot_old_user

Joined 8 years ago

Karma
87
Submissions
45
Member since
Oct 14
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
External partners don't trust the AI companies I think to not steal their work and the partner's moat
Comment · 3 months ago
what about them?
Comment · 4 months ago
that seems a little harsh. I think there is a real usability gap which this takes a crack at.

Some ideas like using viewing a linux dir over _ssh_ using native UI components.. seem cool.

I do agree, some of these do seem like they have already been solved in other ways (like an sshfs mount).

Comment · 5 months ago
it will only get cheaper in the long run
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
haha I couldn't help but silently mouth "BUT WHHYY" before I clicked this link
Comment · 1 year ago
I think its great for recruiting. This signals to the world their investment in making Devs happier (one of top two reasons mentioned was "devs were happier with Kotlin")
Comment · 2 years ago
well it could be a lot cheaper to hire the AI model instead of a human?
Comment · 2 years ago
> You need to wait a bit before you can start faithfully translating the meaning

I guess it's possible that the AI learns about a specific person over time? That way it can be confident about what's being said as soon the person starts saying it

Comment · 3 years ago
But wouldn't the same issue apply to user-space TCP implementations too? User-space TCP implementations too could have "path-dependent sequence of accidents" which a power user might eventually need to figure out?
Comment · 3 years ago
where did you end up going? I love Austin but its a little too hot during the summer.
Comment · 3 years ago
I think getting customers to sign up is the hardest part. Next they could start adding opt-in features (probably already in the works?) which cost an extra few dollars a month each?
Comment · 3 years ago
I'm a little disappointed that the author doesn't explain why throwing the exception is much slower.
Comment · 4 years ago
But the problem is, fixing existing broken stuff might not be rewarded as much as working on the "new feature". This means that if I focus on just fixing the broken stuff, I'd be managed out. Even say I put in the extra effort to fix the broken stuff, and deliver my new features, other thousands of engineers won't do that same- meaning I can't make a meaningful dent.

(i dont work for amazon, but I can imagine it's similar everywhere)

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton