firephonestival
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
We all want our data to be handled securely, and we should try to understand why that does not happen.
Match owns almost all of the dating-app market, and they have extremely deep pockets to buy/extinguish competition with.
Because of the consolidated nature of the market, and the winner-takes-all nature of the industry, I really believe that it is impossible for a new entry to gain popularity and focus on hard problems like security.
This is fundamentally a problem with capital allocation and incentives. There's not much that a small team can do about it.
These days, local news doesn't really exist, and representatives will only listen to big campaign contributors. Social media has stepped in to fill that gap for the modern lower/middle class.
There is a joke about intelligent apes like orangutans and chimpanzees: they could probably learn to speak, but they refuse to do so out of fear that people would try to employ them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-tank_dog
It's a good thing that horses have been superseded. Animals should not be pulled into our wars.
They also sell 1-gram extra-strength Tylenol pills OTC, but that's a very high dose for an average person. And what do you know, acetaminophen is the leading cause of acute liver failure in the US.
Worse, it feels like recruiters are realizing that their shotgunned "[X]-backed [Y]tech startup" emails are not getting replies, so they are starting to write clickbait subject lines!
In the past few months, I've seen a reduction in emails with subjects like, "Interested in a [general industry] [company type] role?" with some details in the body.
They've been replaced with subject lines like "What's up?" or, "Quick question" with minimal details beyond an invitation to "connect sometime".
It feels like they didn't get what they wanted by asking nicely, so they've decided it's better to be manipulative and evasive rather than taking "no response" for an answer.
In most forms of online communication, this type of behavior is considered creepy and disrespectful of boundaries. In recruiter world, apparently it's all in a day's work.
How about putting a salary range and WFH expectations in the subject line? We get a LOT of these emails; give us more information, not less.
You'll end up paying $N00 and $10-30/mo for a good one, but they are very useful for people who use words like "nomad".
You can Bluetooth them to your phone to do things like SMS, maps, weather updates, etc when there's no cell service. They also usually have "SOS" buttons, just in case.
It does not matter if you are interviewing for an opening which has been set aside for you. (Niche skills, nepotism, former colleagues, etc.)
It does matter if you are going for a fungible position with many applicants. Not a lot, but people are biased to hire others who they think they'd enjoy spending time around.
That bias helps attractive people, as well as people who look and act like part of an org's "in-group" (if one exists). It's ugly and gross, but it seems pretty fundamental to human nature.
There are some good books about how ordinary people lived up to around Kim Jong-Un's reign, such as "Nothing to Envy" and "Under the Loving Care of the Fatherly Leader".
Devices such as TVs and radios were always set to only receive state broadcasts, and they are subject to regular inspections. But the safety measures were cheaply produced on a small scale, often a simple mechanical limit on a dial housed behind tamper-evident stickers.
The Tumen River has also been a traditionally porous border where black market media (and cosmetics, food, electronics, etc) could flow freely. As is usual in an authoritarian regime, well-connected people can ignore the rules, smart/wealthy people can work around them, and the occasional unlucky person can be made into an example.
- Dan Simmons, Hyperion, 1989
Also, the author uses 2x 32x32 panels @$97 each as a price peg, but you can get a raw 64x32 panel from Adafruit (a quite expensive supplier) for $50.