filleduchaos

All the more reason why it's important to have an accurate read on the market! I for one also know a few people who've made a pretty penny writing native integrations for React Native and now Flutter apps.

What part of this pretty weird article proposed hosting your own server?

It's an industry-owned initiative, i.e. all licensed banks, including the central/apex bank (pretty sure this is the Federal Reserve in American parlance?) are stakeholders. The funding comes almost entirely from these banks, and the transfers themselves are free (between personal/individual accounts, at least). I'm pretty sure the government partially reimburses the banks to soften the cost, so I suppose you could say it's also funded by government subsidy?

Some similar systems have transaction fees and run as for-profit organisations, but the fees are tiny compared to card transactions. For instance Nigeria's NIP has a maximum fee of ₦53.75 (roughly four cents), with most banks allowing you to transfer up to ₦5 million in a single transaction.

Maybe you just don't know what you're looking at? UPI is an inter-bank system, why on earth would you expect an article on it to contain a payment card messaging flow discussion?

...Are you proposing that coworkers pay each other to have technical conversations?

I cannot think of a single actual food critic that would consider it acceptable for a restaurant to serve a dish for review that they went to the restaurant next door to get. If the critic wanted to eat at/review that restaurant they would simply have gone there instead.

Do you unironically think that all tourism is resort tourism?

This is about as silly as feverishly claiming that e.g. deploying a web app to production is an "abnormal situation".

On top of that I'm sorry but you seem to have skimmed over both the article and what I said in favour of clutching pearls at some nebulous entity apparently claiming that "automation should be ripped out" when what is actually being explained to you is that without actual, manual, hands-on, current experience the "human in the loop" loses the ability to properly control or take over from an automated system - and worse, the ability to even understand when it is doing something nonsensical and/or dangerous.

As an aside, I assume that by "radar systems" you are referring to radio navigation aids. Like I've already mentioned (though in fairness not everyone knows what a non-precision approach means), pilots of airliners are still trained to fly without them, are expected to know how to fly without them, and shockingly enough DO fly without them in the real world where equipment fails or cannot even be installed at all. I know most of the software that people write here is insulated by several layers of abstraction from the hardware, but surely we haven't already lost the understanding that automated systems are not in fact magic - that they depend on real world hardware with real world physical constraints?

> A more recent example is the Boeing 737-Max where there was a focus on automating trim control. In that case, the automation made the system more complex, to the detriment of a pilot understanding and reacting to an abnormal operation

To be fair this is not entirely accurate: a focus was made on stall prevention in a very specific mode of flight given the variant's increased susceptibility to the pitch-power couple. It did not make the system any more complex per se than other airliners - see e.g. Airbus aircraft which do actually have autotrim in normal flight. The actual kicker was that the existence of MCAS was hidden to avoid the need for lengthy re-training of pilots if the 737 MAX was deemed sufficiently different from its predecessor variants (on top of MCAS being rather poorly implemented in its first iteration).

The fact that the autopilot will loudly disengage if there is a serious enough control surface failure to cause an upset is more than enough support IMO.

Not only is landing not an "abnormal situation", contrary to armchair internet wisdom pilots of airliners in fact do not use autoland all the time and don't even always fly a precision approach at all.

Not to mention that they get mandated regular reviews of their ability to fly manually. And even with that, there's still a reason why "children of the magenta line" (i.e. pilots who passively follow automated systems into danger and/or have seriously degraded stick-and-rudder skills) has become a term.

There is oddly enough a middle ground between "zero errors whatsoever" and "outage".

The last sentence in the comment is literally "RAID is the way".

How is it "laziness" to not want to pay $10 to submit a bug fix to your repository?