feralchimp
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
I don't have a list of specific examples to back up that claim, but I encourage other apple devs here to think about recent releases from that perspective.
a) it provides readers with a laundry list of things to go study independently
b) the book author can, given time and inclination, do the same study and improve the book
One of the first jokes I ever heard at a startup was "We'll give the product away and make it up on volume!" Changing the joke to "We'll pay people to take the product and make it up on volume!" doesn't make it less obviously ridiculous.
I'm amazed they were able to hire employees, let alone find investors. Doesn't make the guy's death any less tragic though.
The market already well served by iOS, Android, etc., is people who want to terminal OUT OF their phone and onto a real computer someplace.
What are the real-world tasks you expect to do with the former that you couldn't do, or couldn't do as well, with the latter?
Glad to hear Facebook ads resulted in greater than zero hits, but I'm guessing so would CL, posters in coffee shops, a sign taped to the back window of a car...
But how much else is there to say, really?
Whenever I get the urge to write something like that, I ask myself: "Am I in the target market for this?"
A product built to these tolerances is not one that a rational person (even a competent one, with experience fixing computers) should want to crack open. Make the professionals worry about getting in and out of it, and enjoy the fact that they'll be liable for anything they break in the process.
"Not user serviceable by design" != "disposable by design." You're not wandering across a post-apocalyptic desert wasteland with this thing; take it to a f'ing Apple Store and grab a coffee while the infrastructure wrenches on it.