felipec

> How you treat other people when you communicate actually is important.

In software the user is important. If you are the maintainer of a major project and you hurt the user because somebody was mean to you, you shouldn't be the maintainer of a major project.

Why does that point has to be explained?

> Do you want to rant on the internet about how right you are and how stupid everyone else is, or do you want your bug fixed?

What part of "I don't even care what they do" wasn't clear? I made my objective explicit: to show *GNOME*'s shitty practices.

1. What makes you think I didn't use a patched version? 2. I said I'm using kitty now, I don't care what they do.

I made it very clear the point wasn't about me, or my patch, it's about *their practices*.

DHH didn't refer to foreign-born because that's not what he was talking about. I made it very clear in the article that this is a perfectly valid definition of "native": "living or growing naturally in a particular region : indigenous".

You are not even trying to understand what DHH is saying.

This is the problem with modern discourse: people don't even listen. You don't care what DHH meant, all you care about is the hedges on speech you want to impose on others.

That's not what you claimed. You not only claimed he said there are many non-white people, you claimed DHH *literally* said that's bad.

You are assuming an implication that isn't there.

He never said "I want fewer non-white people".

Every rational person knows what happens to a city when there's a massive influx of immigrants. So we all know what he is talking about, and it's not what you wrongly assumed.

> He's literally saying that britain is now bad because there's too many non-white people living there.

No, he didn't. That's something you are hallucinating he said.

[flagged]

That's what wokeness does to open source projects.

I was banned from the RubyGems project by simply saying "no satisfactory resolution from the development team".

Now woke people are walking away from RubyGems because Ruby Central wants to align with DHH. I say good riddance.

Software should be about technical merit, not ideological agendas.

There's nothing racist there.

Wrong. You don't need a CoC to do moderation.

All CoC's are ever used for is to silence people the moderators don't like.

Autoritarian organizations never explain their reasons.

Wrong. The fork was planned since a long time ago.