Recent submissions

Comment · 6 years ago
My field is propped up by various governments. My paycheck is a combination of sales, bailouts, and loan forgiveness. I also make lots of money.

Should I be in favor of cronyism?

I actually take the other side despite getting paid by them. These companies/Management made terrible decisions and continue to make terrible decisions. Instead of selling and replacing managers we are burdened with zombie companies.

Comment · 6 years ago
>large numbers of N95 masks

Certifications take time, masks are simple, testing takes time.

This is a government problem, not a manufacturing problem.

Comment · 6 years ago
I think consumers and companies should go their best to shift to them too.

Most of our digital world is built on free code not proprietary crap.

Comment · 6 years ago
I'm going to name drop things I don't know about and might be irrelevant

Data/network/transport/session layer can be detected through TCP?

So you need to fudge a few digits somehow at your router.

Comment · 6 years ago
After Google screwed up my music transfer from Google Play to YouTube Music, I'm not using any new Google services.

And it's not like there is any customer service to fix their own problems.

Comment · 6 years ago
I'm a believer that these kind of issues should be solved at the consumers end.

I haven't built a web browser, but I built a bot and it's somewhat doable to avoid getting tracked.

A browser could feed a fake user agent and format the browser to be the correct size. After that I believe it's only IP address and cookies which are easy enough to be blocked.

It even defeats the CSS tracking mentioned. "Oh someone downloaded image 6374tracker.png, but they were from UAE and are using Firefox" and are never seen again.

My only weakness on this subject is the low level headers, anyone familiar?

Comment · 6 years ago
Ahh that was it.

But yep that's how we bypassed it.

I think I bought 6 songs before I found a better alternative. Reminds me how I had 1 iphone (6) and would never get one again.

Comment · 6 years ago
I agree, but if you are a fortune 500 company, you don't quite get to say "no".

You need to provide it to users anyway.

Comment · 6 years ago
I wonder if this is the end goal.

If they are regulated, they can expect permanent life at the expense of taxpayers subsidizing the company.

Be extremely anti consumer and anti developer, advertise to make up for the negative behavior and loss of users.

Comment · 6 years ago
Wait until you download all the same apps and get 0 privacy benefits.

The problem is barely Google. The problem are the Apps you download and giving full permissions.

Comment · 6 years ago
>Apple uses a lot of customer hostile behaviors nowadays

Nowadays? Apple has been doing anti-consumer behavior for multiple decades. I remember only allowing purchased itunes music being exported in their specific format.

You'd have to burn them to a CD and rip it back to a useable format.

This isn't new, any educated consumer is well aware of how Apple plays.

Comment · 6 years ago
No. With government the stakes are significantly higher as governments don't go out of business.
Comment · 6 years ago
This is important because Tesla is a consumer facing company.
Comment · 6 years ago
>SpaceX isn't going to go public, possibly because it's a very long-term endeavor, and his goal is to go to Mars, not make huge profits.

I think it's due to the nature of being a military contractor.

Being public means that Americans can be upset our taxes are going to a billionaire. But private, there's deniability of how much money is coming from taxpayers.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton