Recent submissions

Comment · 5 years ago
> Really? You want media to be state-run in the US?

No, I just don't want tech companies "protecting" me from information. I'll read the direct words from people and process them for myself.

Twitter/FB/Apple/Google are not entities I would ever want choosing what I see and don't see.

[EDIT] Ironic that HN has chosen to censor my account. I guess what I said is too "dangerous" for you, the lowly user to read.

Comment · 6 years ago
One of the reason people need to make new accounts when they post anti-censorship thoughts, is that censorship has reached into our industry and a sort of neo-McCarthy blacklisting can occur if you don't espouse neo-liberal talking points. If your pseudonym can be traced to your identity, you risk your career when you fight for individual liberty.
Comment · 9 years ago
Ah classic dang! Abusing your mod powers to punish and down talk anyone who questions your narrative. The comment in question is absolutely on topic and relevant. You just don't like it so claim it's against "site policy". It's ridiculous that you don't allow debate on these topics.

And yes, I know I'm perma-banned for not being feminist enough for you. I just wanted to point out your systematic pushing of a political agenda to those who dare browse with show dead.

Comment · 10 years ago
We're way off topic but again I support BLM and do feel economics play a role.
Comment · 10 years ago
I'm not attacking BLM. I support it.

This list however I don't support because the members are from wealthy backgrounds and are being presented as needing extra help.

Comment · 10 years ago
BLM is a group that represents economically disadvantaged people. This list is pulled from the upper most echelons of society. Do you think it's ok to represent the wealthy as somehow oppressed?

Please don't take my question as an attack, I'm genuinely curious how people who support these initiatives view wealth.

Comment · 10 years ago
Yes they did 1/2 have of the work they could but I'm not complaining about getting more information. Someone else should leak the RNC. Or possibly it didn't contain as many bombshells? Either way, I'm happy to get more information than I had before.
Comment · 10 years ago
Whoever released the emails did the American public a huge service. They pulled back the curtain and we got to see how the sausage is made. It doesn't matter who they are or why they did it. The end result was important whistle blowing. We should hope that information like this is leaked out as it helps balance the power between the public and corrupt politicians/media in a way nothing else can.
Comment · 10 years ago
I also tire of seeing the repetitive "let's get more X into tech!". I've quoted the article not raised points out of thin air.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton