exo762

Gait analysis - good luck faking your gait.

What we need is a legislative solution to street surveillance proliferation. Germans figured that one out, rest of the world is capable of doing it too.

> The failure of the GPL is that you can't force anyone to collaborate and share if they don't really want to.

Failure of the GPL? How can you even put those words next to each other? GPL is an amazing success. It took software out of hands of SV / VC / corpo crowd and put it where it should be - users.

PoW is trivial to control in its' today form. When the network hash power is dominated by three players, you know every address you need to pay a visit.

Copyleft is still a thing. Right to attribution is still a thing. Please, read about it and you will discover that there is a lot of nuance to the open-source code.

Not jailable. But I'm absolutely free to disregard moral agency of mr. Kim Dotcom and stop paying attention to whatever he says or what happens to him as a result of his support for warring Russia.

> I still don't see how you can keep something anonymous and still rate limit it.

Constructions like this exist for many years. E.g. semaphore RLN (rate limiting nullifier). This particular construction was found unfeasible 7 years ago, but since then zksnark tech made huge progress and it is way cheaper now.

> Or you can spend 50 euros more and get an entire new laptop that is not only much more powerful than your old framework but is almost as repairable: the neo.

You forget to mention - less powerful than his old FW 13 with new mainboard/CPU.

If look good if you look at the image in original resolution. Click on it.

Amazing opportunity! One more demographic to save via age verification laws, with a side dish of reliable personalized advertisement profiles.

Trail of Bits is charging hefty sums for audits. I suppose they could provide some patches.

> Messages by default are encrypted in transit. Client to server.

By this metric Facebook and Google are encrypted, because TLS. Sorry, Telegram's messaging is an attempt to mislead users, plain and simple.

> The library IS used for all encryption.

They could chose to use TLS for for almost all chats, and instead they've "invented" MTProto. Why go with MTProto?

> As far as I can tell from casual use the other end does not need to be online per se.

You are wrong. Phone on other side has to accept "secret chat request" (no user interaction is needed). Until its accepted, initiator's app interface is blocked with a spinning circle. And to add insult to injury, one can't initiate secret chat from desktop client.

> Telegram client(s) are also open source.

Yes, it is very refreshing to be able to verify that they can read all of my messages. /s

> The comment was about the server and interoperability with other clients.

Signal leadership explicitly stated that they care about secure comms and don't care about ecosystem around the chat. You can create your own client, you can't market it as Signal because that might "endanger lives".

> - The phone bits in your and the other commenters response sound a little bit handwavy to me.

I issue you a formal apology on behalf of HN hive mind. /s

On serious note - palata's point is right, but a bit outdated. Functionality is still there, but it became opt-in. New users have phone number automatically hidden and phone number is collected only as an anti-spam feature.

I'll repeat my point again. Telegram is a honey pot of messengers and nobody should use it.

> What is encrypted and how is public information. If it doesn't fit your use case don't use it. There is no "spin".

Correct way of speaking about Telegram is - nothing* is encrypted. (encrypted chats are not more than 0.5% of all chats). That would be a "no spin" take.

> one guy dared write a crypto library rather than using their own

Red herring. This library is NOT used for more than 99.95% of chats on Telegram. It is applied only to "secret chat", which is a torture device with horrible UX. I guess that horrible UX is the result of choice of using custom crypto library instead of going with something capable of working when addressee is not online.

> Another darling is Signal who refused to stop collecting phone numbers until recently even though they never needed it, does not allow open source or other clients to use their servers (and won't release the actual server code) and frankly does not work half as well as Telegram in terms of UX.

Phone numbers are still used as anti-spam measure. You are free to get a burner, register an account and throw away the SIM card.

> does not allow open source

Signal client is open source.

> frankly does not work half as well as Telegram in terms of UX.

It works well where it does matter. Vide Telegram's "secret chats".

> All of this is really confusing for me.

You are clearly misinformed. That explains the confusion.

For the same reason Nixon was able to establish OSHA without a ton of pushback.

Post is lacking in technical details. What it seems to be doing echoes the way ChatGPT is integrated into iOS - your requests are anonymized so your profile can't be (easily) built.

How can I make confer.to work on my Linux machine? Modern CPU.