eugeneionesco

You're spreading FUD.

I suggest you educate yourself on the reasons grsecurity patches are no longer public anymore.

>The webassembly exploit part of the chain bums me out (I was always afraid of stuff like this when I was working on the design for it) but it's pretty uninteresting, really. The simple sort of bug you get when you insist on writing stuff in C++.

I really hope people don't think webassembly is the fault for this, this vulnerability is no different from any other memory corruption vulnerability you would find in the js interpreter or the css parser or whatever.

Beautiful chain of exploits, well done.

If this is the main problem people are complaining about, I am impressed by Code :)

What a great tool from Microsoft!

...for those privileged enough that can decline a job offer

Your site is full of juicy content, thanks!

Of course it does, seccomp, developed way before pledge :))

Stack protector was developed by Immunix, W^X was developed by Openwall, both for linux.

I don't think you know where the vast majority(95%+ ) of browser vulnerabilities are...

All of those are available on linux distributions, enabled by default.

Not only that, they were developed on linux distributions and available on them way before obsd.

All of those were developed on linux and linux distributions and were available on those before obsd...

>I've used it on my laptop. Primarily because it has had few vulnerabilities and is very stable.

The OpenBSD propaganda works I see...

Do you really think the tools you use like your web browser, mail client etc, have less vulnerabilities on OpenBSD than on any other BSD or linux distribution, please...