etrk
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
When the rain or snow or haboob kicks in, I guess your car will pull over to the side of the road and you'll need to drive manually until conditions improve. We'll need to keep the steering wheel around for the foreseeable future.
This is clearly not the case, since image signal processing, 2D Fourier transforms, etc. are alive and well.
What does this question mean? Every band-limited signal has a Nyquist rate. Most signals of interest are well-contained within some finite bandwidth (e.g., human voice). Sampling above this rate will get you very little.
If you're building an ML model to process a certain class of sampled signal and you know, for example, 99% of the signal energy falls within a certain frequency range, that should guide your choice of sample rate. If you're sampling at too high a rate, your input layers may have far more parameters than are needed or useful.
Whether or not a given ML input actually contains a signal of interest doesn't seem relevant to how you sample and preprocess the signal.
It would be interesting to know the prevalence of these illnesses among the cohort of 70+ year old Italians, but that would require more searching/translating than I care to do now. But feel free have at it.
Ipertensione arteriosa (high blood pressure) 76.1%
Diabete mellito (diabetes) 35.5%
Cardiopatia ischemica (heart disease) 33%
Fibrillazione atriale (atrial fibrillation) 24.5%
Cancro attivo negli ultimi 5 anni (cancer in past 5 years) 20.3%
Insufficienza renale cronica (renal failure) 18%
BPCO (COPD) 13.2%
Ictus (stroke) 9.6%
Demenza (dementia) 6.8%
Epatopatia cronica (chronic liver disease) 3.1%
Note that the most of the people in this study were 70+ years old, and I have no idea what the typical prevalence of these diseases is among 70+ year old Italians.I've had a couple co-workers who perhaps see themselves as heroic for coming to work sick, but everyone else resents them and wishes they would just stay home.