etiquette

wouldn't this be extremely risky? there have been a lot of cases of stolen funds from insecure smart contracts

> A real food-delivery page - markup, images & an SVG animation in one .hmml, 30% smaller than the same page as base64

Why the comparison with Base64 when Base64 itself has approximately 33% size overhead?

No, anyone needing secure pseudorandom numbers already knows to reach for a CSPRNG, not a PRNG.

I don't get how this AI slop would realistically work for compliance? It's not like the proof bundle has hardware-backed attestation, any malicious AI agent/person can just, y'know, forge a hash chain and sign it with their key