estearum
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
Obviously Republicans will win a large number of these elections, but even their victories will be a source of great alarm.
Of course they are, by your own hypothesis. You believe it makes sense for the other parties to engage in this behavior. If it makes sense, then they will do that reliably, and one entity can just defect and stand above the rest.
> The point that you're not getting here is that the advantage comes from actually being seen to make mistakes
Ah yes, the ol' "I just do retarded shit so people think I'm a genius" trick. Who could possibly doubt the strategic genius or umm... existence... of such a strategy.
> Again you're not getting it.
No, I understand it completely. Obviously regulatory capture only works if it in reality inflicts asymmetric costs on other parties.
More perfect than simply not making mistakes and allowing your competitors to make mistakes (or to, apparently, fake mistakes in their own attempt to get regulated)?
Regulators reading OpenAI's 99th mea culpa: "Ah yes, well I bet they've figured it out this time! We should regulate everyone else!" Lol what a joke.
We need 50/50 Republicans and Democrats
50/50 Commies and Fascists
50/50 Totalitarians and Anarchists
50/50 Pro-lifers and pro-choicers
50/50 gun fanatics and gun haters
50/50 Dog people and cat people
50/50 People who like asparagus and people who don't
What exactly are you proposing here?
I have a simple proposal: competent people can apply for the job, and so long as they execute their duties without prejudice, they get to keep the job. It's really that simple!
Repeatedly blowing up your own munitions factory is not a good way to prevent other people, but not yourself, from running a munitions factory. Obviously.
Obviously the far better solution is to blow up other people's factories, or make allegations of unsafe conditions at other factories, and repeatedly demonstrate excellence and safety within your own.
Here, award-winning gymnasts are alleging that the frontier labs are simply choosing not to do that, and instead choosing to have explosions and minor fires every few days at their own factories, many of which they try to hide (and probably many more of which they successfully do hide). Believing such astounding bullshit is a testament to the power of motivated reasoning and the conspiratorial mindrot that now plagues our civilization.
I'm not even necessarily against GoF research, and I mostly agree with all of your points.
I'm asking about GP's logic.
It's not great when finance people are openly talking about trying to time the top.