ericwooley

The entire concept of fronted frameworks is an anti pattern?

This might be the oldest, grumpiest man on the front lawn yelling at childreniest take we on web dev, that I’ve ever heard

Been running it almost a year now, without anything breaking except some gnome extensions.

> ...so let's replace it with a system that imposes zero accountability on representatives whatsoever? That's an alternative, but not a solution.

I think the point is that accountability isn't as necessary. A random person will running the show after the next lottery, and whatever bribes and deals you have are probably off the table.

Hasura with graphql code generator is an amazing, type safe, and secure combo. I've never been able to develop a rest API faster, much less with documentation and type safely.

It might not be faster than rails/html, but it's a hell of a lot easier to reuse, understand, secure, and audit.

I use it, it's pretty good if you expect your project to grow pretty large. I wouldn't recommend it for something basic.

It can get hard to get some things working well. Eg expo, which has a 3rd party package, but it's usually pretty far behind on the version of nx it supports.

Personally, I've just started using blitz js for smaller things, no need to split things into packages.

That will show em!

Look at all the convenience your giving up, just so you can be red flagged.

It's not the same thing. The argument would have to be: violent video games lead to more violent video games, which, anecdotally, I would probably say they do.

> and it would all but eliminate any concern about an employee suffering psychological trauma.

I doubt this. If they were all images that this person happened to be into, maybe... But even then, I think it would likely make their addiction to child porn worse, which is it's own psychological problem that is probably worse for society than the trauma suffered by current employees. What happens when they leave that job, and are used to seeing hundreds of cp images a day?

Not to mention, that some of the stuff the scanner would be looking at would probably be horrific, and violent. Looking at that kind of thing all day would probably have similar psychiatric affects on pedophiles and non pedophiles. In the worst case, it might cause some pedophiles to start to like the worse images out of boredom from seeing so much cp.

Overall, I'd say this is would just be a bad avenue to go down.

Yes, that would be fine. As long as security is covered. Mandating a standard API would be awesome.

A) that would be clever, and if the bad guys are that clever, they will easily find another way to share their stuff. B) apple could simply make a policy that your Icloud will trigger a scan / review after x devices are logged into it within a certain amount of time, in order to make sure you aren't using Icloud as a distribution platform for something. This whole scanning locally on device wouldn't be necessary.

> this is against the terms of the Apple developer agreement.

Of course it is

Heaven forbid we have any choices at all.