ericlavigne

Joined 18 years ago

Karma
393
Submissions
148
Member since
Aug 22
http://ericlavigne.net

http://github.com/ericlavigne

http://ericlavigne.wordpress.com

.

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 3 years ago
The author tried this treatment on herself. I was unable to find data associated with this self-experiment, such as lactate measurements on multiple days while applying the treatment. Is there another article I missed that covered this?
Comment · 4 years ago
FogBugz just sent out a retraction. Their intention was to retire the free service and offer the opportunity to upgrade to paid accounts at a 50% discount. If anyone was charged and didn't already receive a refund, the email to request a refund is [email protected].

Here's the beginning of their retraction email, in which they explain how this happened.

===

Dear FogBugz User,

Mea culpa — sincerely.

We’ve become well aware of the maelstrom of concern and comments caused by a series of emails that some of you received, but to explain, we were just as surprised as you when multiple emails were sent. Our original and only intended email, which was controlled by humans, was to inform you that the “free,” non-expiring version of FogBugz is being phased out on October 17, 2022. Additionally, we wanted to offer you the option to continue using FogBugz by updating your account to a paid subscription. This was the entire, planned effort.

However, once we updated the accounts that had been identified as free and non-expiring in the internal FogBugz accounting system, the software automatically generated a form email, notifying you that we had summarily converted you to a paid account, and worse, actually triggering collection/dunning notices to some. This was unintended and is not accurate. Yes, we’ve owned the software for some time and should know all of the nooks and crannies by now. We don’t know if this was a nook or a cranny, but it decided to act on its own. Truth. It’s embarrassing, and we’d react the same way as many of you have. So this email is to set the record straight.

We do not automatically charge any customer for usage of the software unless a subscription has been expressly elected, despite what the erroneous auto-email stated.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Why Sars-Cov-2 is a suspect:

1) Many of these hepatitis patients tested positive for Sars-Cov-2 when they arrived at the hospital for hepatitis.

2) Sars-Cov-2 is changing fast. Just in the last few months it has changed substantially several times. Increased hepatitis risk in kids might be one of those changes.

3) The usual causes of hepatitis were not present, and no better explanation has been found yet.

Investigation still in progress. Might be one of these two viruses. Might be something else that hasn’t been detected yet.

Comment · 4 years ago
Last week’s WHO emergency announcement of the same issue: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/a...

Top suspects are both viruses: Sars-Cov-2 (COVID-19) and adenovirus 41. But the real cause could just as easily be something else that hadn’t been detected yet. It’s just too early to be certain.

Comment · 5 years ago
The most damaging hurricanes rely heavily on warm water over their last 2-3 days before landfall. Suppose we focused these bright cloud emitters on the water in front of a tropical storm, as a way to prevent it from strengthening into a hurricane?

Imagine the city of Miami deciding that eliminating local hurricanes would benefit its local real estate market. They invest in a fleet of hurricane blockers to be deployed off their coast during hurricane season to reduce the odds of getting hit by any hurricane, and almost guarantee no more cat 5 hurricanes. This project is worth it for Miami because it has a dramatic effect on home values and insurance costs... And the world also benefits from the cooling that Miami's hurricane shield produces.

Comment · 5 years ago
Very disappointing that the top comment on this article is COVID misinformation. The forcry account was created 3 weeks ago and specializes in COVID misinformation.

No, CDC isn’t messing with the tests like this. And all this fancy talk about CT values is just cover for a false statement about CDC policy.

Comment · 5 years ago
Imagine the CDC yelling: "Don't throw that away! I need more details! Please! If you won't finish the job, please let me do that work!"

That's my translation of the document I found when looking into this issue. More details below...

===

"CDC is suggesting CT value of 28 for detecting breakthrough infections after vaccinations... So that means, a breakthrough infection needs to have 128 times viral load in someone who has been vaccinated to be considered as positive, than it is required to have considered as positive in a non-vaccinated person."

This sounded strange to me, so I searched for more information about it. It looks like you just misunderstood the CDC's policy.

This document regarding breakthrough case investigations was the second result in a Google search for "cdc ct value 28". The relevant text can be found on page 5 of that document.

https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/105217/cdc_105217_DS1.pdf

"If SARS-CoV-2 sequencing will not be performed locally and a specimen is available, the state public health laboratory should request the residual clinical respiratory specimen for subsequent shipping to CDC. For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value <=28 to CDC for sequencing."

In other words... Imagine some lab just found a breakthrough case. And this breakthrough case had an especially high viral load (Ct 28). And the lab was just going to report a positive and throw away the sample...

Imagine the CDC yelling: "Don't throw that away! I need more details! Please! If you won't finish the job, please let me do that work!"

That's what the document is saying. There's a rare event that needs extra analysis. CDC is just letting the labs know in advance that if they ever see this event, and didn't have the resources to fully analyze it, please send that sample to the CDC so it gets the attention it deserves.

Nothing to do with whether the test is considered positive or a breakthrough - just about whether to put extra effort into gathering more details on that particular case. CDC is volunteering to do this extra effort only for higher Ct values. Whether or not they do this extra work, it's still a positive result either way.

Comment · 5 years ago
Adaxa Technologies | Lisp/Clojure Software Engineer | REMOTE | Full-time

Adaxa Technologies creates software that powers dental insurance plans for over 4 million members across 8 states. We've grown from just 1 state to 8 in the 10 years I've been here and are still growing fast.

As an Lisp/Clojure Software Engineer, you will design, create, and maintain software that interfaces with clearinghouses, Medicaid agencies, and plan sponsors. As part of a small team, using technologies such as Clojure, Lisp, and MarkLogic, you will be responsible for the accuracy of our most critical data and solve difficult engineering problems in a distributed system with terabytes of data while ensuring performance and scalability. This is a very data-focused software engineering role - heavy emphasis on data integrity and performance, not user interfaces.

Apply by sending an email to me (Director of Software Development): elavigne at adaxatech dot com. Include "HN job posting" in the subject and include both your resume and a code sample for us to review. Code sample can be in any language to give us an idea of your programming ability.

Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
If each phone generated 500 numbers per day, then TimeIntervalNumber is a number in the range of 1...500. So generate 500 codes using all of the numbers in that range. If any of those 500 codes match one of the codes that you actually saw in the wild, then you were near that person.
Comment · 6 years ago
I’m part of the CoEpi project, one of the member projects of the TCN Coalition. I see that some of my teammates are searching through the OpenTrace code to see if anything there is worth taking, such as their device-specific bluetooth range calibrations. I don’t think there’s been any two-way communication between these teams.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton