Recent submissions

Comment · 1 hour ago
Yeah I'd definitely want to hear the other side of the story before jumping to conclusions on that "biased attack piece" that made its rounds (it's very possible Proton is indeed in the wrong and can be fairly criticized, but I've seen enough conflicts like this where I want to hear what the other side says before rushing to judgment, especially about a tech company which was otherwise liked by a lot on HN it seems)
Comment · 1 day ago
Monetization death spiral?
Comment · 1 day ago
wishing you and others luck

if something happens, it's probably not your fault?

Comment · 1 day ago
Looks like a smear post, easy for anyone to do

Should wait for and read Proton response before taking it seriously

Comment · 2 days ago
tbh I feel these headlines are kind of sensationalized, it's just about how you use AI, and that determines if it is beneficial for you or not

Anything like how the internet or search engines or telephone operators (lol) "change your brain" articles I guess could be written ("Why didn't you just manualy memorize or look up a phone number yourself, what, do you want to download a brainrot?!")

Comment · 2 days ago
yep, they changed from the archived article I linked from vox.com to a NY Times article link. (I only posted the archive link I did because it was a wall on vox and I couldn't read article otherwise)
Comment · 2 days ago
Comment · 2 days ago
I think there's been a pushback on this view lately, that this is only one factor to consider or that the studies leading to this kind of conclusion are flawed?
Comment · 3 days ago
Sometimes I wonder how many resources things like AI actually save rather than consume (I don't see that reported on as much)
Comment · 3 days ago
Tobacco is a nootropic

Social media is a powerful tool for sharing and obtaining info

Poison is the dose

Comment · 3 days ago
ITT we can maybe discuss effective alternatives to strikes

> start alternative better businesses or work for them

> encourage work reforms in society like remote work / 4 day work weeks

> write in

Comment · 4 days ago
it never should have had any place, it never made sense, it's always created more problems than it solved
Comment · 4 days ago
> the title

sounds bad...

> the article: "pirated the work of over 10 Stanford professors to train its Claude models"

that just... doesn't seem like much compared to so much other scraping though, right?

Comment · 4 days ago
Comment · 4 days ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton