elwell

Trogdor - the AGInator

Why were you hoping you didn't?

Are you offering?

> There’s always going to be a market for well designed UX

A bold claim

Not without reason. I believe it, in view of the entire context.

Sounds more like the "scribes and Pharisees" that Jesus preached against:

"They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people's shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger. They do all their deeds to be seen by others. ...they love the place of honor at feasts and the best seats in the synagogues and greetings in the marketplaces and being called rabbi by others. But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven." -- in Matthew 23

Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater, and don't throw out the Christ with the 'christians'.

> it won't replace the real experience and taste required for larger projects

[Citation needed]

Isn't this a proof that the usage data is truly "de-identified"? If OpenAI could prove that "their usage" influenced the finding, then it wouldn't be de-identified. (Also, it's a bit disingenuous to trim the "While unlikely," prefix.)

Felt more ChatGPT that Claude

Honestly...

So is the comment you replied to.