el_fuser
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
and apparently very few on HN in general, seeing how this piece was upvoted.
Google has been studying their process in the last few years and are reaching different conclusions than these guys.
Leave it to the reader to ascertain which group has more validity.
Begs the question, doesn't it?
>> Binary trees are MOST ASSUREDLY on that list
Sure they are... and my intro to CS textbook was ~500 pages. I'll bet I could find something to trip up just about anybody, especially when coupled with the pressure of doing it in front of the class ^H^H^H people that have $$$$/power over you.
He also would've nailed it had he been given 10 minutes to do some research to refresh.
Silicon valley (and the numerous companies that mock the interview style) are testing for the wrong thing when they hire, then complaining about not being able to find good engineers.
Having your factory retool weeks before you launch an unproven product because you don't like the glass? Not very pragmatic.
That's not the Steve Jobs I read about. Like him or not, he was a man of principle.