egsmi
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
Today, that doesn’t save binaries not distributed through the store or ones you compiled yourself via other compiler chains.
It is possible to change that. One could even imagine it as part of the loading procedure.
Very true but it is interesting that Apple is often used as an example to follow on avoiding a monoculture. In the business press anyway.
https://www.torbenrick.eu/blog/strategy/avoid-an-organizatio...
Honestly, the reality is most engineering is tedious and boring and mired in context. The old 10% inspiration 90% perspiration quote always rung true for me. I think you’ll struggle to have anything other than a superficial conversation of any hard problem or question with any engineer whose not closely associated with your team.
[1] Examples abound but this is my favorite: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37638098-creative-select...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37638098-creative-select...
... to people outside of Apple. Apple has 137,000 employees in 25 countries. I’m sure you’ll find someone to discuss your work with.
Do you think it's so unfair that 90% of students would feel the same way? It's not impossible but personally, I would be surprised by that. Which is the point. Experiences vary dramatically, especially if we broaden the statement internationally, so knowing who was asked what is just as important as the claim.
Honest question, I am not trying to be obtuse, but in this context can you more specifically define fraud? Is it just "ad fraud" as defined here: https://www.clickcease.com/blog/what-is-ad-fraud/
I get why businesses should care about ad fraud, but why should I, as a consumer care about it? Frankly I don't even want to know about my traffic, let alone yours.
Does anyone know which study this came from? I was trying to figure out exactly how the survey question was worded because this statistic seems somewhat amazing to me. The driving one I get because drivers are not being routinely graded, but students are.
I googled the phrase and I basically got related quotes, this article (from 2010), and a couple of studies that came after this article was posted, and they were mostly looking at gender differences in preceived intelligence and after a quick glance, didn't seem to support this statement.
What you wrote is not wrong. But if Microsoft can change the office UX then Google can do it too.
[1] https://science.howstuffworks.com/nature/climate-weather/atm...