ectoplasm
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
https://www.prismnet.com/~hcexres/style/pompous_words.html
First time encountering the expression for me. It's not about jargon, as far as I can tell.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._cities_with_most_...
http://www.japan-guide.com/topic/0011.html
The LGBT stat came from Wikipedia. For controversial stuff like that in the US, WP is pretty good. I used to think it was 10-15%, 1 in 7 was the number I learned growing up, I guess it's 1 in 25.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_Unite...
For me, "abnormal" generally means "what is wrong with you" (the response given here), whereas "normal" can even include eye-rolling and "oh so you're one of those". The difference between 1 in 33 (3%) and 1 in 666 (0.015%, from the tail end past +3 sigma which accounts for 50% - 99.7% / 2) is really quite palpable.
But again, let's face it: it's not as common as I thought, and it's not as uncommon as you thought.
Let's face it, we're both being kind of sloppy.
Personally I would never do it, but like, different strokes.
Also, define richly. Assume monthly savings of $2000/month on housing, call it $500 / week, that's $25 an hour. Plenty of people make less than that, so again it's just priorities.
+/- 3 sigma = 99.7% of the sample, and we know 3% is > 2 hours (for all of Japan, not Tokyo). There's near the same percentage of LGBT adults in the US (~4%).
All we're arguing over is the use of the word normal. Would you be happier with "uncommon but not an extreme outlier"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL