e38383

Start at the OS level, you have maybe another 6-12 month left to find something built without AI.

So, basically: just bear with us a little bit longer and then drop all computer usage (this will include every tech which blinks).

I probably could find some really useful things for it to help me … but all software nowadays only works outside my earth region :(

This time even for pro.

You probably need to include EN16931, XRechnung, Factur-X, ZUGFeRD, … and how they all called, the new standard for electronic invoices.

The wording sounds like this is a problem or even something to solve. Why?

But let's start with the basics: - Why are these people not countable? Shoudn't we not at least just be able to get a good statistical number on this? We do the same for all people on (and off) this planet. - Let's assume we have a number: how to we know that they sit and are alone and every day? This sounds to me like an overspecific approach. - Why would anyone join local groups? You normally can't find people you want to interact with within a specific range, that's the great thing about social media or the internet overall: you don't need to be in a geographic range.

And the last one: what are you trying to solve here?

I just wanted to submit that too.

A really great article about the state of vibe coding at the end of 2025.

This guy produces real software, ships it, and — as he claims himself — often don’t read the code anymore.

"attempted" would be more accurate IMO.

I still think that the word redacted is meant to destroy the original text, it might not remove the metadata (e.g. length).

Redaction is done mostly in ways with a possibility to reveal the underlying text, but all this is not redacted in my understanding of the word. I always liked the english word for this – the german word "schwärzen" just means to "blacken" the text and this was never the same for me.

But after further research I must agree with you, it just means to obscure or remove, but not clearly just remove. I have been using it for years in a stronger meaning that it's really meant.

One more but: we hopefully can all agree that putting a black bar over some text which still is just copy/pasteable is not even obscuring.

It’s either redacted or not. There is no "bad". The text is either there or it isn’t, sorry but this is a binary option and not on a spectrum from bad to good.

Thank you, I came here just to verify that no "hack" was involved.

The page is a bit sparse ;)

What will the pricing be after the beta? And what are you exactly offering? Only a database or also authentication or storage?

Can you maybe compare it to something established like Supabase?

Does this support every feature of the messengers you support?

Why is every second article about this claiming that it’s automatic? It needs to be turned on or at least there was no mention of automatic in the original blog post.

I really hope that we can continue training AI the same way we train humans – basically for free.

I don’t think one is still „old“ if they died. The oldest person is normally the oldest person alive and that’s the opposite of dead.

So, no: there is still an oldest person. It just switched to someone else, happens all the time. It’s a bit more apparent with the youngest person, everyone was the youngest person at birth - at least for a short amount of time and then it switched to the next one.

Up to 500 emails / month

100 tests emails/month | 50 emails/day

100 test emails/day

50 emails/day

What are the limits really and what is the difference between a test email and a non-test email?

Thanks for mentioning that, I must have missed the Duo pricing. It seems the blog post is from April, so at least I‘m not years behind :)

This is really a good price, let‘s see if I get my wife to switch over.