dumbfounder

I don’t think she was lying. She created a cartoon and published it irresponsibly. In my opinion, that makes it her fault. And I think that AI is not going to be found culpable for issues like this in the future. The user needs to understand they can’t just publish whatever it creates. There are open source AI models that would have near zero culpability and in that case I believe very, very clearly it will be the users responsibility. And I think that will extend to paid models as well.

As I said, I am talking about the publishing, not the training. If it produces his signature, which basically claims he created the art, then that is the line he believes was crossed. I am saying that it is up to the user to understand when those lines are crossed. The user could have done this in photoshop as well without ai, would we blame photoshop? Training is a separate argument, it is not what the article tackles.

Why would ChatGPT be sued exactly? They didn’t publish the picture, they did what the user asked. The user is responsible because they directed the creation and publishing. The user is the entity who should be sued. Or dmca’d. Or whatever.

Think if the user commissioned the art from an outsourced creative shop nobody has heard of. Then they published it. They wouldn’t go after the creative shop, they would go after the publisher.

(I am just addressing publishing here, training on the artist’s works is a different, well discussed issue)

I eagerly await your update with the benchmarks on this :)

If it's (nearly) all streamed from disk can you use an intel/amd machine and a big fat gpu and use the SSDs (nvme for faster throughput) as your virtual vram? Or something like that?

Meh. Chess exists to entertain the players. Coding exists to solve problems. I see way too often the programmers think it’s all about the coder and the code. Solve the problem. Don’t write code at all to do that if you can (AI generated or otherwise).

Is that the service that everyone turns off as the first step of setting up their new Linux box?

Controlling which tools it has access to is called sandboxing.

Oh my god for the love of all is holy why can’t I remove Apple Music.

It’s just a SaaS service like any other. They all want to use your data, but there are terms to make sure they don’t.

Maybe a hybrid approach. Scramble to create a final exam/project and give them the option to do pass/fail or a real grade, their choice.

And then wish for the death of saas and a day where you can deploy your own software you can control and modify as you need.

No, users should demand it.

For open source you get what you get and you don’t get upset. Has anyone ever sued an open source project?

Now what we need is a chat interface to develop these config files.

DMCA?