dudifordMann

As a lefty who moves the mouse to the left side of keyboard, WADS is no more awkward than any other keyboard combination for left or right headed people. Just, you know, shift your keyboard a little bit more towards the right for comfortable spacing lol.

I agree that there are individuals and companies who have defined such ridged structure and expectation into their Scrum method that they can no longer be considered an agile approach missing two of the key purposes of agile approaches:

* Individuals and interactions over processes and tools * Responding to change over following a plan

Now, I cannot say that Scum abstractly is a bad approach to attempting to be more agile. Many of us have employed some form of it with varying degrees of success, but, the expectations on software developers from a business perspective are more rigid for business development and tracability purposes, which can,on occasion, omit the consideration of resource demands and complexities.

Often, i believe, it is that a lack of understanding the purpose of the agile manifesto and the poor implementation of a method at the top level of the developer and managment ladder which is the underlying cause.

In the post, the author cites 3 hour or more meeting where he feels there are too many people there. This would be an item for the retrospective feeding the next iteration, but he only says "Blergh" about the needed feedback.

He states that the standup is more ritualistic, but the point is to ensure each member understands where the sprint stands, inspire collaboration, but really take ownership of the code. It could be that the team size is too big, or that the team really has not taken ownership of their code.

When all is said and done, you have to buy into the Scrum process, the process has to be flexible, and the stakeholders have to not believe it is a magical development method that fixes all the issues of the software development process.

Another great tool for touch-less interfaces. I think the odd aspect of this Google I/O demonstration is the novelty usage of the technology for a smart watch. This tech seems like it is more difficult than it's worth in that form factor, but for devices that must remain sanitary, say in a kitchen, or a medical device in an OR, I like the potential.

Perhaps this is good for feature development, or maintenance, but, what about contracts that deal with wholly new development of a complex system? It seems like you would want to operate in parallel at least for the initial push through the architecture and boilerplate structure. Perhaps I am being disingenuous.

I do love the idea of being able to not let the numerous tedious meetings interrupt progress.

[edit] Thanks everyone for adjusting my perspective. I am sure junior engineers (and seasoned stubborn ones) would learn a lot with cradle to grave development in such a fashion [/edit]

I am not sure if that is the right mind set:

"So around the time a lot of people have kids? ...you need to make a LOT of money to pay for daycare ... you might as well just stay home."

The "you" can be the other partner. Ensuring fair pay and opportunities for all qualified workers would encourage only a brief departure from a woman's career for maternity leave, allowing either partner to be the home support (as needed), instead of making the choice based on poor future earning opportunities vs their male peers.

0 is no more than 20,000

100 is no more than 20,000

i don't think verification is needed...

[edited for carriage return]

That is a lot of trust in a corporate entity who in all honesty trys to profit from you wherever possible, and they would not be sued if such items were spelled out in the TOS. In this plug in, the plug-in author placed a notice where it could be found by anyone, not hidden away. Here, just as dspillett said, do your own due diligence and select products accordingly.

At the same time,even large trusted corporations can impose interesting license agreements (runtime or otherwise) that you better be well versed on before you start creating releases of your product.

Right... so... if the coach is payed say less, than... could the students see a decrease in their tuition bill as the funds for the coach have freed up? Now, I am terrible at evaluating worth, especially for things as potentially complex as leading a sports team (was success due to the athletes? strategies? leadership? etc. Similarly for failure), but if Nick Saban is making 7.09 per year at Alabama, with a student population of 36k, the full salary divided by the population would be about $196 per year, which I am sure a student would love to see. (obviously my math is assuming full salary liquidation which is not realistic).

Hmmm, this might just be a candidate for a conspiracy where they are in reality shorting the market?

wow... the grammar... what on earth did i write...