Recent submissions

Comment · 6 years ago
I see your argument as avocating for a flavor of wealth redistribution. Is be interested in hearing more, but would prefer to explore the idea in a less polarizing, more academic way. Any sources?
Comment · 6 years ago
I agree. I'm here because I like being part of a community where folks are balanced and measured and without outrage culture.
Comment · 6 years ago
For what it's worth op, I never saw the criticisms, just the original article. Replying is like a Streisand effect. If you must reply, replying less directly might serve you better.
Comment · 6 years ago
Too many of these personal finance apps aren't putting the web first
Comment · 6 years ago
I use this too. Maybe I like the beancount more, but having my finances available on the web to share with my so is valuable. Too many told are meant for one pers,on and don't support modern ideas like tagging.
Comment · 6 years ago
Be warned, EE jobs are drying up. I think they had negative job growth recently
Comment · 6 years ago
I agree with the duality that you describe. Nevertheless, wouldn't the software part of an SDR reduce the need for expensive physical electronic components, while increasing ability? An amplifier seems to be the only additional expense (as you pointed out). It seems like the amplifier negates any cost benefit, yet utility remains superior if one doens't consider multiple components and building blocks a liability. It seems like there are expensive SDR transceivers (e.g. Flexradio) which utilize SDR technology to beat out the competition in specs and performance. To get on the air with a budget SDR, I haven't seen lots of demand for the idea. is the utility of a budget SDR just not better than your basic radio? It seems like it to me but where's the demand?
Comment · 6 years ago
Does anyone have a good reccomendation for an HF transceiver? It seems like many popular SDRs are receive only or crazy expensive. I've been looking at the RS-HFIQ (https://www.hobbypcb.com/index.php/products/hf-radio/rs-hfiq) but it doesn't seem to be that popular and I can't tell if it's because it's got too much "hacker" in it for the average ham, or if something else is going on. Maybe I should just spend more money?
Comment · 6 years ago
I'm interested in HF, but I'm interested in transmitting too. It's my understanding that Airspy is receive only?
Comment · 6 years ago
I hadn't heard of othernet. APRS is cool and ripe for disruption.
Comment · 6 years ago
Don't forget about the baud rate limit too. Who likes that?
Comment · 6 years ago
Does gdpr forbid mistakes?
Comment · 6 years ago
I feel like amateur radio is dying not because it's old, but because regulation blocks it from staying new.
Comment · 6 years ago
Let me offer a different perspective. Is rf engineering and research obselete? Should the ability to experiment be locked into spectrum owned by monopolistic companies? And from another angle, is an Arduino project that blinks an LED worthwhile? Spectrum is a limited resource and amateur bands are one of the last ways I know of for folks to experiment within radio without submitting for expensive fcc certification.
Comment · 6 years ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton