downut
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
I had one fellow in the back of the room at UF in the basic algebra 1 course(!) who began the semester by once or twice a class doing a reasonable impression of a mooing cow. I kicked him out. Didn't happen again. Classroom atmosphere had better vibes after that.
Based on the classes the Math Department gave me (very satisfying) and the student evaluations this seemed to work more or less fine. I was a brutal grader though, some of those entry level classes had bimodal distributions with 'F' being the low mode.
I also showed up for office hours and did my best to help people learn by digging through their questions.
I don't see why this methodology wouldn't work fine today. I wouldn't care now how a student learned. Show competency on the human only test and we're good.
I had one student who achieved a solid 'F' come by office hours after the course to tell me how much he enjoyed my teaching. Whatever!
Anyway, teaching that way, with the positive interactions with students interested in learning, was one of the greatest experiences of my life.
[1] An absolute pedagogical shitshow that wasted everyone's time for zero gain.
"There's never been a better time to go into math" was the final statement of the ten minute orientation session from the Dep Chairman.
It was a great thing to do anyway.
Then.
The 80 bit format was an at-the-time (ATT) engineering optimization that made ATT double precision (DP) more attractive given the better round-off behavior, at "no-cost".
So the interesting question here (that I don't know) is: is "deterministic" quad-precision (QP) as the accuracy upgrade from "non-deterministic" 80bit internal DP, always better economically?
Depends on what the computational problem is, given a budget. And that budget buys things that are only available on the market.
I used to think technology monocultures were a good thing but given the current state of things I have reversed myself. I am happy that life has simplified for you though.
I've been watching, lightly, interval arithmetic for 40 years. As you know algorithm sensitivity information is mandatory. We used intel 80bit FP do evaluate that, slowly, back in the day. We didn't use interval arithmetic, though we knew about it. It wasn't economically viable. Hey C++ what can you do for us? Templates, damn.
How important is interval arithmetic, economically, now?
Is that inaccurate? If not how did you store the extra 16 bits (DP)? I should've bought a zortech compiler back in the day? ;-)
I am sorry that Borland hooked me with turbo-p and then jacked me up with turbo-c/c++.
With the NAS Parallel Benchmarks we were trying to encourage as wide a diversity of hardware and algorithms as possible so we were lenient with the acceptable "valid" interval of "correct" behavior. I've already discussed heretical Cray FP. Those were fantastic systems. No way would we disqualify some weird/different algorithm/architecture if it meaningfully advanced the SOA in performance/efficiency. OTOH wars were fought over having any firm accuracy requirements at all. So this jvm thing looked... pointless at best?
This is all nostalgia for a past that actually was. Those were the days my friends.
I dunno Walter but as the first(?) IEEE754 implementation in a PC system it seemed like a pretty damn big deal to us people working in numerical algorithms. It was a big enough deal to me at the time (I was in graduate school) that I've kept my 8087 chip all my life and have it before me now. I see the old boy has lost a pin during the last move, dammit.
Chip has "3716150AA MALAY BEV 22" embossed on the pin side. Search gets me nothing.
As far as delivered accuracy of the 8087, performing the operations at 80 bits, rather than 64 it was better than non-extended formats. Anyway you can read all about it here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_precision#x86_extende...
Kahan endorsed is all I needed to know.
I can't remember the details from back then but the initial Sun java implementation did something weird with this.
Listings:
No HOA fee: 32 up to $500/month: 62
I'm not going to bother because this is an HN comment but I think you can imagine what happens to the results when I specify newer than say 1993 (when my house was built).
I have an HOA, but it seems defunct. Everything we do to the house, if visible, can be interpreted to mean I must get unanimous agreements, in writing, from all my neighbors.
It turns out I managed to land right between two asshole neighbors (constant trespassing, dogs, etc)
But isn't this sort of structure just completely transparent to [Nation|Narco]/State Actors? Feel free to widen the set of economically interested actors.
How do you scale video interviews?
I think I am missing something about this scene. I really want to dive in tho.
Compared to what? Your string of comments are banal generalities that may or may not apply to this particular situation. Where else in this world at this time, is this particular governmental failing handled materially better?
Singapore? China? Russia? Switzerland? England?
I have sometimes learned interesting things from you (as a commenter) but there is nothing to learn here. It appears to be only diversion and distraction.
It's a big world out there, whatever "here" means.
That last sentence makes me wonder, do you enjoy ads?
I went to a Super Bowl party a while back and the half time show glitched continuously. Random weird glitches for the rest of the time. => note to self: don't pay for this.
Sorry malfist for thinking bad thoughts. I've redirected all that negative energy back to its rightful owner: Samsung.
The washer next to that dryer was an LG, and in my notes I never touched it.
Always good to reattach to reality.
Ah, I see that the washer/dryer pair we bought new 4 years ago and hauled across the country are LG ThinQs. Very happy with them. Apparently can be "smart" but I shut that down.
[email protected]