doc_ick
Joined 10 months ago
Karma
81
Submissions
295
Member since
Dec 6
Recent submissions
Comment · 14 hours ago
You say that like it’s a problem?
Sounds like the junkies have to be fed one way or another.
Comment · 1 day ago
“It’s a job that requires lots of human interaction, and this part is notoriously complicated for engineers.”
Don’t worry, human interaction is very complicated. Thankfully there are no llm models/google/xai with technology to do exactly that. Your pearls are safe.
Comment · 2 days ago
Unless you’re able to get a patent on day one, once an idea is public potentially within the hour someone can make more money off of it and it’s not just your idea. Seems like a valid case to lock it down.
Comment · 2 days ago
“if you are researching anything that can be applied to the industry, you will instead have 1 year of market ownership and first-mover advantage.”
I would like to disagree with you on that point. Given the very popular rise of https://rea.tools/, it appears the time to reverse engineer anything software based (up to maybe 80% or more?) could be down to minutes. With a recent example, some indie video game developers are not going to show off their video game until release as a few have been flipped and made it to market before the original developers have. Point being, a few moths of market ownership could be possible if llms can’t reverse it in any way.
Comment · 8 days ago
Do we want everyone who doesn’t know how to program a car to reprogram their car? I.e. I think there should be restrictions on frontier models to ensure safety of others.
Comment · 8 days ago
In no time? What are you talking about? It’d take months even with llms for it to be fully polished and tested if they started now.
Comment · 13 days ago
“ if you're mad about your problem being solved, maybe you weren't in it for the right reasons”, politicians/financial advisors/military members/etc… would like a word with you.