dlikhten

FWIW: In iOS, all icons are varying size, just they have that little border around it forcing all sizes to feel identical. Its a good trick.

BTW He forgot to mention: Why is it that on every fucking device out there the back button and menu button are placed in different locations? Like samsung = right, htc = left, google = left, samsung's evil twin = in the middle of the screen.

Problem he is not addressing is that using an android maker to make android-like phones and trick people into a fragmented market is a problem. Furthermore, those without the true android os, will be disappointed citing how android sucks. They need to protect their image. It's either full android or go home.

You have to balance "don't be evil" with "this product needs xyz to survive or the competitor (apple) will murder us in the market."

Hence google's new strategy to patent everything and their mothers to protect themselves.

He left out the irony tags.

Don't forget, unlike windows, LOCKING a mac is not easy. The only way I know is to use the lock command of Alfred. In windows: Windows + L = lock boom. Because of this, most people in the office leave their macs unsecured.

TBH, these numbers pale in comparison. I don't care if FF is a few instructions faster than Chrome. It's good competition. Chrome and IE both have multi-process capabilities which make the whole experience significantly better. FF has yet to catch up to that.

You miss the point. The poor SOB ship won't even know it. It would be a submarine that attaches itself in Japan to a ship known to head to the US. Or mid-rout. And that's that. In the US, we have a small ship waiting for the cargo sending a signal to wake it up and detach.

The beauty of current AI is that the compartment can be set to notice divers nearby and "walk" to the other side of the hull. Since sonar can't pick up small attached objects, boom you got yourself the equivalent of a smuggling bed bug. The crew can be all detained while this happens because they are not in on it.

The only issue would be noise made if you have listener crews. That one would be tough to solve. That's why you attach yourself to large boats, not to small smuggle ships.

We must see the first step. He is trying to stop the bleeding. My guess is that the signs are there that the bleeding has started, it just hasn't hit mainstream yet.

I am always wiery of these maneuvers because they can swing both ways. I must say, good for the CEO to response; smart man who realizes the company is going to get hit, hard, and soon.

The only question left is: to trust or not to trust?

Let's see if PP makes any official announcements on policy to combat this.

To be honest, I knew this was going to happen. Apple made the lawsuit against samsung, but google has a big BIG bomb to throw: Map Reduce. If google whips out map reduce, apple is screwed. Basically without it apple will be VERY hard pressed to do business, it's techniques are used by many frameworks in the iphone. This would be the equivalent of the US throwing the a-bomb on japan. Apple being japan.

Apple, with googarolla's lawsuit, may have actually realized just how big of a bear they hit.

Now, I sure hope the dispute ends, BUT as yequalsx points out this is a dangerous slope. While I don't believe they will form a patent cartel, a 4th party trying to create a new mobile os will be in danger. While google won't sue, Applesoft might.

Android FTW. I know this pops up constantly, but this is EXACTLY the reason I advocate for android. This sort of shit does not fly there. Apple has the ability to censor which even the government can't and worse is that it's fully legal.

I really wish people would take these stories as a sign that we need to focus on the android market.

FWIW: I am not advocating for the baby & bathwater argument. I think we must focus on android because it will put market pressure on apple to have a more fair/just approval process.

The "less is more" argument -- less code = better can be better summarized as:

"I'm not smart enough to understand this really complicated code, so I decided to write something smaller and simpler."

This is something a co-worker of mine said once.

It's funny, the overall article is not about "how do we disarm conservative arguments" it's about a certain type of argument and how it is used. The examples were "liberal" but that is irrelevant, the point is identical.

Yes, we are celebrating the ability to use tabs to open mail vs a browser tab. Because surely nobody likes browser tabs. sigh news fail.

You sick bastard!!!! Now I had to buy 5 shirts just to make sure I get my free one. How dare you! KHAAAAAAN!!!!

edit: set self destruct code: kirk0001 <-- lol at complexity.

"too big to fail"

I wonder if facebook fails, will that be a good thing where a lot of developers get on the market thus allowing startups to hire :P?