diogenes1

you fired the gun, not the manufacturer. why would they arrest the manufacturer/inventor/etc for something that was done by you?

there have been multiple coordinated attacks being made, it's quite naiive to assume US is not involved here

unlike 'peer 2 peer' cash usecases of crypto. ethereum added a lot of social elements to it with ens names. All sorts of common folk use tornado cash to keep their private transactions separate from their public address

this right here, is the crux of the argument

true. none of smart contract blockchains today are actually a practical tool till lightclients that run on smartphones are mainstream

so when are we arresting engineers who built roads and trucks that were used for money laundering?

Source - ChrisLemont

get off your high horse, use of tornado cash is quite common among crypto natives, otherwise it's like broadcasting your pepsi purchases on instagram

even more shameful is the tone of conversation regarding this in internet forums now vs in 1993. How the hell can you be pro arrest of developers

one of the most shameful moments in digital human rights after the arrest of pgp creator in 1993. Code is speech, it is not a weapon. Banning maths is fascist

which is fine, since you can back another cpi/whatever automated chainlink index adjusted asset with it. Sure the efficiency will not be as good as fiat but it's robust

so badly written wtf

Didn't know they had a gateway. at least there will be competition to infura till stateless clients allow running clients through browsers/wallets directly