digitalPhonix
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
Just normal emotional manipulation.
Present the victim as an angel who was so perfect that they forgave the perpetrator => the perpetrator is an irredeemable villain for harming the angel => maximum penalty
> HN is for sharing between humans
My (and others’) comments are knee jerks when that guideline gets violated.
Are they building off firefox/servo/ladybird? I couldn’t find a quick answer but the ios/mac Orion is based on WebKit (I guess webkit is further up the fork ancestry than Chromium)?
> The policy is asymmetric, and that's what makes it harmful.
Well I found the problem already
Correct
> Amazon has nothing even approaching a monopoly
Sortof? It probably doesn’t have a monopoly in any segment that matters, but it does have many illegal monopolies (as defined by US FCR and the Sherman Act).
Evidence: Amazon has been found guilty of being an illegal monopoly multiple times already.
Business typically need to pay invoices for services they asked for?
I can see why the countries that were not first to industrialise are not on board with that idea.
The rights holders that got a settlement out of Anthropic spent two years and probably a fortune fighting in court. If that’s “easy”, then sure, this is a solved problem and there’s no point discussing it.
> An example where no one attemped to hold anyone liable isn't a counterexample to what happens when we do.
Yes it is (specifically, a counter example to it being easy, not that it’s possible). The whole world saw HuggingFaces get hacked and the collective legal response was crickets. The same world that’s had its legal system throw the DMCA and unauthorised access to computers legal book at researchers, games preservationists and random people trying to access media that they can’t licence in their region.
Australia has no term limits and has famously had the longest serving prime minister (12 years) followed by extremely short terms. All seemed to represent the general will of the population.