dexter0

Key points:

> Despite these profits, crypto has brought El Salvador more costs than benefits. The free publicity has been welcome, yet crypto-investment and crypto-tourism have been small beer. Gains in financial inclusion and from more efficient payments are meagre at best: the currency never really caught on. In 2022, when the hype was at its peak, a survey by CID-Gallup found that only a fifth of firms accepted bitcoin and just 5% of tax payments were in crypto.

> Moreover, the policy cost $375m in all—from the Chivo rollout, subsidised transaction fees, bitcoin ATMs and more—according to Moody’s, a rating agency. That far exceeds the profits on bitcoin holdings, which could still evaporate. By delaying an IMF deal, the crypto experiment kept El Salvador’s risk premium high.

This is what has been unclear so far. What kind of access is the DOGE seeking? Read access seems within the scope of their "mandate" to audit spending. But if they are going to insert themselves into the process or start blocking payments, that's much more concerning.

> Investors allege that Meta did not fully disclose the risks that Facebook users’ personal information would be misused by Cambridge Analytica...

Anyone following this case and care to share their thoughts of how likely the plaintiffs are to prevail? Is the expectation that Meta will settle out of court?

> In the immediate aftermath of Synapse's bankruptcy, which happened after an exodus of its fintech clients, a court-appointed trustee found that up to $96 million of customer funds was missing. The mystery of where those funds are hasn't been solved, despite six months of court-mediated efforts between the four banks involved.

This is the real question.

In time.

Seems like the "Whaling and Culling" theory is playing out as speculated. Also, I'm surprised they still have 2700 employees left. The "reporting" last week made it sound like everyone but a small handful left the company.

Seems like the "Whaling and Culling" theory is playing out as speculated. Also, I'm surprised they still have 2700 employees left. The "reporting" last week made it sound like everyone but a small handful left the company.

Sure. Apps can embed libraries that allow the developer to push in-app notifications to all or specific users.

It's not clear from the tweet and video: How is his exfiltrator piggybacking on an excluded Apple process? Is nsurlsessiond in the exclude list?

Wouldn't a contingent election scenario be impossible unless a third-party candidate won one or more states?

Lots of negativity in here. As a paying Dropbox customer, I am interested to see what Dropbox can bring to the table. I’ve been stuck on 1Password 6 since they moved to a subscription model. If Dropbox’s offering works well, I would switch.

> You've made a calculation: my value to the company is greater than $150K, and $150K is a price you're willing to pay to leverage that value.

Part of that value calculus was that you are willing to relocate (or already reside in) the Bay Area. In other words, if the company offered only $90K and still required you to live in the Bay Area, you and most other qualified candidates would balk at the offer.

> The only thing that changed is where I choose to reside. What difference is that to the company?

Clearly the company is betting that if you walk away instead of accepting the pay cut, they will be able to find another qualified candidate among the now much larger talent pool they are able to court with remote work.

This looks amazing, but the fact that it is implemented in an entirely new compiler (atop LLVM, sure) is a major turn-off. Would be more useful if it were implemented as a meta compiler instead.

The fragile ivar issue is fixed in the modern Objective-C runtime.