dev_hugepages

If you use local models and actually train them on an artist's output, it will look extremely close to that artist's work and will also match the signature.

The image generator shouldn't exhibit the signature problem after it's been reinforcement learning trained.

I think the OpenAI people have trouble with monitoring their model's output because the model has a ton of quirks that shouldn't be there

Comment · 1 month ago

This isn't a human you are asking your question to.

Comment · 1 month ago

From https://newpipe.net/blog/pinned/newpipe-and-online-advertisi...:

> In summary, it can be said that sponsoring is a good approach. It is fair and non-discriminating to all users, preserves their privacy, lets creators select their partners themselves, and provides them with a larger share of the revenue. Even though there are some disadvantages, it is more or less beneficial for all sides. [...] Ethical advertising, for example through sponsorship, should therefore not be touched by us. This would turn our key selling proposition from being privacy-friendly to being a gatekeeper for advertising. And this is not what NewPipe ever has been or wants to be. We’ve always stressed that NewPipe’s main goal is to protect the users by maintaining their privacy, not to, e.g., provide features a user would otherwise have to pay for, for free. Regarding SponsorBlock: after a lot of discussion within the team, we decided not to support this system. As stated earlier, we don’t consider advertising in general problematic. It’s the unethical, privacy-invasive systems that are very common today which we consider evil. Sponsorship provides a mostly ethical way of advertising.

Comment · 1 month ago

If that makes you feel better, the guy who vibecoded an app in one sitting will probably have 0 clue on how the code works, the app itself will look like the average claude eyesore and the docs will be unreadable by humans without stimulants

Comment · 1 month ago

"Computer, make a meme site where people can upload files so I can reach the top of hackernews. Make no mistakes."

Comment · 1 month ago

If i'm not mistaken, this already exists, and the assembly language here is called PTX

https://llvm.org/docs/NVPTXUsage.html

Comment · 1 month ago

This is called an oomkiller. The kernel has one but it kicks in very late and the kernel prefers to do page trashing instead of killing processes.

systemd-oomd should be integrated in systemd, you can configure it to your liking and see if it improves your problem.

Comment · 2 months ago

To be fair the internet also had huge amounts of slop before the advent of chatGPT

Comment · 2 months ago

This is a quirk of the last gpt image model (gpt-image-2). It put this sort of high frequency noise on all of the image especially if it's in a "drawn" style. There is often lots of other tells that this model in particular generated it.

Image models somewhat watermarking the image in a way that's very easily identifiable by a human seems present in all the image models of the big labs, since DALL-E 3 on OpenAI's side and the first nano banana on Google's side. I have no idea what they did to reach this and why they don't try to fix it.

Comment · 2 months ago

I'm unsure why you're using an LLM to generate images. Don't we already have models (some made by the same company) that do this?

Comment · 2 months ago

I do AI assisted images for fun and browsing their art I can't see any tell of AI or even tracing on AI; people became paranoid and jump to conclusion without any substance and I find it sad that people who put a lot of time and effort into their craft are getting knee jerks comments like this.