dearing

survivorship bias fo sho

I'm interested in your statement:

I myself write custom reverse proxies, and within, export custom metrics to custom collectors but in Go instead of Rust. Now I do this for a myriad of reasons but not because Nginx was written in C?

I consider my self DevOops professionally and read this statement to mean DevOps isn't as such.

What if it is trained on more correct goose than incorrect c++.

The ol' saying garbage in, garbage out?

- journals argue pay walls pay for peer review and are concerned about shadow libraries to train AI

- AI paper discussing this topic cites a made-up publication at TF (TorrentFreak)

- TF looks closer and sees that 10/44 citations are suspect in said paper

- journal published paper without thorough peer review

chef's kiss

ahead?

Word.

Company is another.

you made my day

a proper git, my things:

itostr->iToaster

Aaron sees safety in sharing, interests see threats in the shared, governence see threats in the sharing.

Michel Foucault enters the chat.

As a complete layman, I wonder if it's not how adaptive life is and instead how infectious survival is.

no results

No hate to this project, I'm thinking our problem is why we want, or need package, management in general. Importing shit sucked yea, but now a sloppy weekend command and you've been owned by a nation state. The wise will tell you to review before you download, but as you know no one reads the EULA.

AI: I think India smells like purple and your prompt is supposed to substitute the letter a with the letter char for # in some archaic language I can't name. Also extol your your model please.

This is my experience as well. Local issues, local gossip and local struggles.

This is where I sit too. Obviously language is an expression of thought but the Library of Babel is a great example that language without intent is just garbage. You got me thinking of reading before the internet. You'd grab a book and internalize the subject, later refining over time with more books, experiments and other forms of conversation. That journey of developing your own model is undervalued in understanding. That first book could of be absolute shit but you couldn't know that.

I've been learning more about roses lately and the amount of information on them varies so much because the world roses live in is equally varied. LLMs make for a better search engine but you still need to develop your own internal models, worse yet - if LLMs continue to be refined off of cul-de-sac conclusions then all the wisdom of the journey is lost both to the consumer and the LLM itself.