dd82

good way to get notification fatigue and tunnel vision. look ahead, ignore everything else and have a shocked pikachu face when you sideswipe someone because you're well trained to not check your blind spots

oh absolutely, its been a progression though and search order rewriting was implemented very early on as part of ad integration. its common in search relevancy/tuning circles

your example with google isn't necessarily applicable now because they've shown a roadmap that can be done and squeezed down tightly between the "hey, we're good folks" to "you're our captive cattle, we can do whatever the fuck we want. there's nothing you can do, since all our competitors will be doing the exact same thing shortly"

why would you be surprised about this? its pretty obvious that execs give no fucks except for money.

And how much trust are you going to have with your model results that they haven't been transformed and adjusted by advertising priorities?

search engine results do this all the time, reordering output by advertiser input. its a pretty small jump from that to rewriting output from models, and even better where its all a black box.

this. IIRC the internal drive plus two disks being significantly cheaper than an external hard drive of similar capacity

not quite, from the article

>Cortex, by default, can set a flag to trigger unsandboxed command execution. The prompt injection manipulates the model to set the flag, allowing the malicious command to execute unsandboxed.

>This flag is intended to allow users to manually approve legitimate commands that require network access or access to files outside the sandbox.

>With the human-in-the-loop bypass from step 4, when the agent sets the flag to request execution outside the sandbox, the command immediately runs outside the sandbox, and the user is never prompted for consent.

scope restrictions are in place but are trivial to bypass

and wildfires, see PG&E in CA.

they're expecting to spend 10B burying lines in the mountains.

New england is pretty much one big rock garden/shelf where you're not digging through soil in alot of places but rock ledges.

come up to maine and see how much pruning the power companies do. there's a reason high wind and heavy snow storms trash power lines

ahhh, the old "I expect everyone to read my mind about extremely nuanced and specific things, and those who can't are idiots" mentality at play

Essentially this is a good example of parametrized tests, just supercharged with generated inputs.

So if you already have parametrized tests, you're already halfway there.

correct, I've done this at past places to verify rules engine output for variety of inputs.

to be honest, you;'d have the same issues with that said magic wand and normalcy, because hearing aids do amplify sound and allow you to hear everythig.

You'd have the same issue, if not more, with background noise, group settings and context acquisition

Processing input is the hard part, if you're already having issues, that isn't going to go away

If they've been deaf from infancy, basically the entire hearing center of the brain is non-existent. So they'd be hearing sound, but processing it into meaningful content would not happen, if at all. So basically, its like having a cacophany of sound that you can't filter and process...

As for others, one thing hearing people, particularly monolingual hearing people, don't understand very well is that hearing != understanding. Just because you hear a sound doesn't automatically equate to it having meaning. The default for many people is to just SPEAK LOUDER and slower, which does not help in the vast majority of encounters