dax_
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
If this is the level of care that goes into news articles, then we're doomed. What will ultimately happen is that AI summarizes AI articles, which got summarized from another AI article, which got summarized from another AI article, .. and after enough rewriting all facts will be gone from articles. I don't care to read this slop, and I'm shocked people are so readily accepting this new state of affairs.
On the other hand, if I request a virtual server, it takes less than a week, and I can work with it much more freely.
And as the internet deteriorates due to AI slop, finding good training material will become increasingly difficult. It's already happening that incorrect AI generated information is being cited as source for new AI answers.
And if I were to give over personal information to an AI company, then absolutely I'll prefer a company who actually complies with GDPR.
Noone will care to share anything for free anymore, because it's AI companies profiting off their hard work. And no way to prevent that from happening, because these crawlers don't identify themselves.
The whole notion of adding LLM prompts as a replacement for code just seems utterly insane to me. It would be a massive waste of resources as we're reprompting AI a lot more frequently than we need to. Also must be fun to debug, as it may or may not work correctly depending on how the LLM model is feeling at that moment. Compilation should always be deterministic, given the same environment.