daveoflynn
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
Well, one mouse and one trackpad didn’t survive a recent toddler/tile floor situation. But that’s not Apple’s fault ;)
Have a look at the ACLU website... their position is quite clear.
All fixable, but payroll companies are generally chosen on price, not innovation.
In today’s good news story, we can change “may” to “will” in the headline to match the updated story :)
(1) https://twitter.com/mliebreich/status/1175080738116571136?s=...
That was pretty annoying. If I hadn’t been on a site demoing captchas, I would have assumed the site broken and moved on...
More time can increase the likelihood that you can get some piece of parachute fabric above your head. And if you can do that, the odds go way up. There’s a saying I was taught on the first jump: “keep fighting until your goggles fill with blood.”
But if you cannot get a parachute out for some reason, a longer freefall will only give you more time to contemplate your fate.
For humans, no. After ~10sec you’re falling at terminal velocity, which is generally 2-300km/h, and your odds of survival are extraordinarily close to zero.
This lady had a double malfunction, where there were issues with both main and reserve parachutes, but per a police report (1), she was descending at 60km/h, so she must have had at least some parachute material out and slowing her fall.
She’s very lucky, despite what’s likely to be a shitty next couple of years of rehab, but this isn’t a “fell from an airplane without a parachute and survived” miracle.
(1) https://www.lenouvelliste.ca/actualites/une-parachutiste-gra...
To the best of my knowledge, this class of engines were originally developed for model aircraft.
To echo others: yes, a lot. To quote the Information Commissioner:
> "I have no intention of changing the ICO’s proportionate and pragmatic approach after 25 May [the GDPR intro date] ... Hefty fines will be reserved for those organisations that persistently, deliberately or negligently flout the law."
A good overview of the ICO's approach: https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/gdpr-uk-watchdog-...
The whole draft policy for how the ICO applies its powers is here. It's a good read, but not short: https://ico.org.uk/media/2258810/ico-draft-regulatory-action...
> Despite these challenges, our revenues have held up, increasing 5.7 per cent versus last year. ... we achieved an operating profit of £1,952 million before exceptional items and a return on invested capital (RoIC) of 17.3 per cent
source: page 18 of https://www.iairgroup.com/~/media/Files/I/IAG/documents/annu...
I think BA (and their parent IAG) are going to be just fine.
The problem here is: in the transition from the -NG to the -MAX, Boeing added this protection and didn’t tell anyone.
Imagine someone added Adaptive Cruise Control to your existing car without telling you - the first time the car braked on its own, you’d freak out. The car is suddenly behaving in a way it should be able to.
If you know the system exists, you can recognise what’s happening and deal with it. If you don’t know it exists, the behaviour is going to be absolutely baffling, and no in-flight diagnostic procedure has a step for “did the manufacturer add an important safety device and not tell me?”
Source: https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/ireland-s-contri...
Many of the trade offs that Boeing has made - outsourcing, devaluing internal expertise, focusing on shareholder returns over risky long-term bets, and aggressively fighting unions - mirror US culture more generally. There’s little evidence that nationalising Boeing would change this - as an example related to this news story, the DoD is outsourcing more and more of its training and aggressor flying to private corporations.
It is worth pointing out that many of the points about Boeing being a public/private enterprise also apply to Airbus.