darkwater

The linked interview in YouTube has sama saying basically what the article states, you can go and watch it. And I think it sparks a discussion worth having, here on HN.

Why has this been flagged?

Which model are you using? If Anthropic/OpenAI aren't you tripping any "cyber" blockage?

Isn't store of value something that keeps up with inflation? I put 100$ today, which can buy X, in 20 years I can still buy X with that, while 100$ can buy just X/2.

Otherwise I just use the dollar bill as the store of value

Saving one memory...

I took note of your suggestion, next time I will write the README in the voice of da-luce/astroterm README.

Can you tell me which division (i.e. 2.1) and specific point you are referring to? Sections seems to jump 3 by 3 from one page header to another

As an Italian, I'm astonished by Italy.

The issue seems serious but the part about Australia and 000 that would ban an attacked device seems the typical LLM-being-too-anal paragraph, and completely lacking common sense.

Maybe I'm wrong and naive but given that the AU law was done to force people move forward from 3G only phones because the network was being shutdown and 000 moved to 5G (I believe), it's a law for operator to contact their customers still using an old phone and migrate them to a newer one. I doubt they will block automatically the number if you are under that DOS for a few days in a row.

Hey this is really impressive! Just played for 15 minutes and even if it's probably vibe-coded it's really well done! Congrats whoever did this!

The original poster actually talk about their singular experience, rather than a general overview. Even worse, they apply their feeling about how the future would be on their own past experience, arriving to the conclusion that the future will then be bleak.

What you say can be in the right direction, but that doesn't mean that the linked piece has a really, really oh but REALLY narrow perspective, even among the developer/HNer type of person. Because not even for the average person here the only way to meet people is due to the code they (or other) write.

Yes, there are. A popular protest (and even riots!) should come entirely or at least in the vast majority from a sentiment spread across the people. If it's 500 youngsters that come out of the blue following a campaign orchestrated most probably by a foreign state actor, then it's not legitimate.

Yes, we could start doing verbal and mental gymnastics about how an external actor could be legitimately interested to try and drive the political landscape of a country one month before elections, sure. But it's not the point here.

Why static output history for a session/tab with reload on restart should be a multiplexer feature? I mean, the Ghostty GUI has already multiple tabs and split terminals, aren't those multiplexer features as well? I don't follow you.

  For eg. optimizing skills, it can help to put more important information at the bottom of a skill. 

  LLMs are tuned to overweight very early information so that they don't disregard system prompts. You might be able to exploit this by placing some important facts near the very beginning of a conversation.

Aren't these 2 parts in contradiction then?

Who is this guy? The blog has just this single post