dabreegster
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
- a scrollbar and search for the Online Library would be helpful
- switching difficulty levels in the middle of reading could be helpful. Or if you keep that on a separate page, returning automatically to the last open position. (I was floating between beginner levels to find the right amount of challenge)
Why trust results if you can't see the methodology in detail and apply the approach to your own data? I once knew somebody who built a fuzz tester for a compilers project, got ahold of a previous project's compiler code that won best paper awards, and discovered a bunch of implementation bugs that completely invalidated the results.
Why is the peer review process limited to a handful of people who probably don't have access to the code and data? If your work is on Github, anybody can come along and peer review it, probably in much more detail. And as a researcher, you don't get just one chance to respond to their feedback -- you can actually start a dialogue, which other people are free to join in.
As long as a project's README makes any sort of quality / maintenance expectations clear upfront, why not publish your code?
meet.hn/city/gb-London
Socials: - github.com/dabreegster - x.com/CarlinoDustin
Interests: Climate Tech, Climbing, Cycling, Hiking, Open Source, Programming, Social Impact
---