Recent submissions

Comment · 5 months ago
> This is exactly as much malware as those were.

A joke virus email is a sign saying "please throw yourself down the stairs."

An obfuscated prompt injection that tries to delete data is someone greasing the stairs and turning off the lights.

Both rely on the environment being unsafe, but only one is deliberately trying to make the failure happen.

Comment · 5 months ago
Calling prompt injection "not malware" because LLM behavior is unpredictable is like saying a phishing email is not an attack because humans are unpredictable.

Even if maybe the mechanism of "injecting a prompt" could be beneficial in some use-cases, e.g. to instruct an LLM positively, this is case is clearly malicious by intent. The author even tried to hide it by obfuscation.

It's just an insane take by that libraries author. Even someone "on their side", that may even hate AI/LLMs more than him, would probably drop that library in a heartbeat, as the authors judgement clearly can't be trusted.

Comment · 5 months ago
AFAICT this was added only afterwards, after this issue got attention.
Comment · 3 years ago
Your description is pretty on point. It was eerily casual in relation to how much turmoil it creates for me. One day it was gone, another day, it was back. I have no idea why anything happened.

I also think that social-media reach has helped my case.

It feels very dystopian that this is de-facto way to approach these issues with mega-corps.

Comment · 3 years ago
I live in Germany. I'll look into this.
Comment · 3 years ago
Would still mean that I'd have to seek other employment. It's not possible to live of your own apps without Google Play. I tried other app stores. 95% of traffic comes from Google Play.
Comment · 3 years ago
I don't wish this on anyone. It's more of a coping mechanism. You "hope" it's not undeserved because the alternative is nightmarish and means it could hit everyone at random, like now.
Comment · 3 years ago
Yeah that's me :(

You always read about these stories and think "they probably deserved it" and then it hits you.

I have no idea why Google thinks my app is "Stalkerware". This is like a bad dream I'm hoping to wake up from.

I think this is "automation gone wrong".

My apps are privacy friendly, have no ads, and most are even open-source, e.g.: https://github.com/d4rken-org/sdmaid-se

How do you formulate a reasonable appeal without knowing anymore details. I've been formulating an appeal texts the whole day, but don't know what my argument should be. Saying "my app isn't Stalkerware" probably doesn't cut it. I fear this is my first and only step.

Some similar apps also got banned, but others didn't. I don't see a pattern yet.

If Google thinks a certain type of app is no longer welcome in the store, then that's their choice. But then they should communicate that instead of banning me without warning, and banning me for LIFE from selling my own apps...

Any advice? I feel so lost :(

Comment · 3 years ago
It's fun
Comment · 3 years ago
Eeriely similar to how Google treats Android developers...

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton