d3rockk

It's encouraging- when one part improves usually the others follow.

> Free speech is in essence, absolute.

Your point is moot. If speech is entirely absolute until violence is threatened, some of the most destructive crimes in modern society would become entirely legal.

Even under U.S. law, free speech has well-defined limits.

First quote that came into my heading after reading your comment: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters.."

-

It has, and always will be, F@$% the oligarchy.

"At RunRepeat, we conduct lab tests on hundreds of athletic shoes yearly, measuring everything from shock absorption (ASTM F1976 13) to traction (SATRA TM144). We make this data available to researchers and academic institutions to support science in footwear, biomechanics, and material developments."

Documenting measurements, using machine testing, and standardizing evaluations is above and beyond any YouTube unboxing.

Even crazier idea would be the possibility of 'normal bullets' that travel along the curve, and 'special bullets' that travel on a direct diagonal via warped space & time.

This would be an insane video game map.

>Yes, but on whom does it work?

Hitting the nail on the head here-> know your target audience.

I was about to say the same thing..

I use a dual A7X setup with a Sub10 Mk2 in a proper studio listening environment, and I can easily hear the difference between a low‑quality MP3 and a fully lossless WAV/FLAC. I do have trained ears, but even an untrained listener could probably notice that level of difference.

True, but the subscription model is what allowed them to stop caring. Subscriptions will likely kill more software companies than AI in the long run.