cygn

Check it out: https://slopsieve.com/extension

Accuracy is also much higher than this approach here. 0.9944 AUC, 0.966 [email protected], 0.971 [email protected]

- a slop detector / browser extension that filters slop replies from twitter/hackernews/reddit: https://slopsieve.com/

- tweethoarder ( https://github.com/tfriedel/tweethoarder ), saves my liked tweets and makes them searchable

- mattermost_archive - syncs all my mattermost channels and makes them searchable via an MCP in claude

- https://github.com/tfriedel/asana-exporter - same thing for asana

- https://github.com/tfriedel/dynalist-archive - same thing for dynalist

My pain points with PRs where people vibe coded something is a bit different though: - I'd like to get an idea how they prompted and developed the PR. - I want to see if for example they just took everything the AI gave them or if they interacted with it critically - I want to see some convincing proof that they tested it, e.g. manually. I.e. along the lines of what Simon describes here: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Dec/18/code-proven-to-work/ - I want to see an AI doing a review as well

I quite like it!