Recent submissions

Comment · 2 years ago
Formalizations for the competition were done by hand.
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
Come up with many possible answers, formalize them all, and then try to prove or disprove each of them.
Comment · 4 years ago
One possible cost measure is thr number of evaluations of the probability function.
Comment · 4 years ago
I've done that many times and never used exact equality comparisons.

If you do exact comparisons for any non-trivial cases, you'll find different compilers, optimization settings, runtimes, and processors give different results.

Comment · 4 years ago
Only if each value is equally likely. If you see $1,000 but figure the envelope-filler is a lot more likely to have been willing to put $1,500 in than $3,000 then you should stick.
Comment · 4 years ago
You're assuming here that there are discrete stages that do different things. I think a better way to conceptualise these deepnets is that they're doing exactly what you want - each layer is "correcting" the mistakes of the previous layer.
Comment · 4 years ago
Standard RL algorithms will converge to optimal play versus a fixed opponent, but will not find an optimal policy via self play.

One intuitive way to see this is that a sequence of improving pure policies A < B < C < etc. will converge to optimal play in a perfect information game like chess, but not necessarily in an imperfect information game like rock/paper/scissors where Rock < Paper < Scissors < Rock, etc

Comment · 5 years ago
Seems to have missed the existence of jax.jit, which basically constructs an XLA program (call it a graph if you like) from your Python function which can then be optimized.
Comment · 6 years ago
Or our entire evolutionary history of data.
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
I think you were right the first time.
Comment · 6 years ago
Because you might think that people having employment is a good thing, worth encouraging through the tax / benefit system.

Also, tax credits can be (and are) paid weekly.

Comment · 6 years ago
The proposed approach amounts to subsidizing human labour over automation. That night be a legitimate public policy aim.
Comment · 6 years ago
I agree that rejection is always tough. I spent a year manoeuvring to be made redundant from a job I wanted to leave (e.g. told my boss I wanted to go, made sure everything I did was covered by other people). And still, when they did finally let me go, the rejection did hurt quite a bit.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton