cyberguppy
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
Putting aside the snarky remark about IE's apparent target audience, there are any number of contemporary sources which give examples of how your intended statement is factually incorrect.
For example: http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f3800/v-e.pdf
Sorry.
If the value you place on the friendship is less than the amount owed, bring out the lawyers.
When users grab an App for free, they leave worse reviews in aggregate, nearly every time. In the mobile marketplace, people who have to spend money to buy Apps normally have money, and often have jobs, which sometimes means they're adults, which occasionally means they act like adults when they decide to review an app they decide to spend money on. People who download apps for free often decide to act like privileged little brats and berate an app for any feature they perceive that it should have but which they fail to find (regardless of whether said feature exists in the app). They leave poor reviews and don't factor "value" into the equation because all they ever download are free Apps and they expect nothing less than Angry Birds every single time.
In calculus terms, it would be like taking a derivative of the Amazon marketplace and operating on different rules than most or all buyers and sellers on the marketplace.
The trick is minimizing your risk and making sure to adhere to Amazon's terms. [Does the scenario in the grandparent comment go against Amazon's terms I wonder?]