cslarson
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
But it does surprise that so many technologists are falling into this trap (disregarding the innovation because of the plethora of junk it enables). The value of permission-less platforms and protocols should no be assessed absent of curation. Google, email spam filtering, wikipedia, the web abounds with examples and without curation we would be in a sea of shit.
uniswap is a good example. when they release an upgrade users must explicitly adopt the new version. in fact uniswap v1 and v2 still see usage despite the release of uniswap v3.
Anyway, here's hoping he continues as an anon. That's really the only way. People are ridiculous.
That's a reasonable way to describe programmable blockchain - availability for these attestations.
A lot of this is just new, though. So explaining like this can only go so far and ultimately it must be experienced, like the original web in the 90s.
It is a database with a new property: data and rules for manipulating data can be fixed. Yes inefficient in iops but who cares - it allows a whole new class of activity.