cronelius

glad I wasn't the only one. every other sentence had antithesis, it was exhausting to read even if accurate

So does this mean no Lodash 5?

Cool branding, but I'm not sure how it's different from the products offered by big lab providers aside from being private — and if the compute runs in their cloud, then it's always a "just trust me" promise

false equivalence

Sure but my father isn't asking his fellow humans unanswerable questions about God and the universe. People don't treat other people as omnipotent, but they sure as hell treat LLMs as though they are.

well actually since 1 == 0.999999… and 98.82 is 98.91999999… there are an infinite number of 9s

This is cool, just don't let Rob Pike see this, he will have a conniption. Glad you called out that it shouldn't be used because this is about the most magical thing I have ever seen in Go

There is a popular postgres client for Go called pgx. This naming will likely sow confusion

Now, do one about neurodivergent brains and confirmation bias

psa, "is comprised of" is almost never correct. "comprises" means "is composed of". so when people say X is comprised of Y they really mean "X comprises Y" or "X is composed of Y"

This is exactly why BYD is and should continue to be banned in the US. It’s not that they are doing this, but that they have done it and they have the capability

their chatkit demo (chatkit.world) doesn't even work in safari. also "react bindings" and "vanilla js" isn't exactly "framework-agnostic". I don't like the idea of embedding someone else's UI in my app. This seems like an overly generalized solution for a specific set of problems.

LLM improvement is a sigmoid, not a parabola. The sooner we understand this, the less money we will lose to deceptive marketing

Isn't this what Unwrap() is for? errors.Is calls Unwrap if it's available and then compares _that_ error.

I mean you could just Venmo him