crazytony
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
As someone else pointed out, they probably weren't ready by the time they needed their systems for the morning rush so they went to their business continuity strategy (manual). This has a throughput and recovery time penalty and obviously it compounds the longer they are in that mode.
I think what we're finding with the Southwest meltdown and now the Delta meltdown is that the big airlines just don't have the manpower or scheduling slack to accommodate going into business continuity. I do think this should be investigated. Hopefully financial penalties incentivize action but time will tell.
With hearing 911 and other safety critical systems going down, I hope that the worst that comes out of this is a couple delayed flights and a couple missed bank payments.
https://www.reddit.com/r/crowdstrike/comments/1e6vmkf/bsod_e...
Wonder if mountain waves play any part in this incident? It's the only thing I can think of that could possibly generate a dutch roll without continuing flight stability issues. (They could have also turned on/off something like the yaw damper in the cockpit but that's not specifically called out int he report)
I can't imagine the standby PCU causing this incident unless there was some kind of electrical or pneumatic issue causing it to engage.
But 737 + PCU issues (yes, I know it's been redesigned) is never a good day.
Hopefully we'll get a NTSB report on this one.
JAL 123 crashed because hydraulic pressure on all 4 hydraulic lines and 90% of the vertical stabilizer and 100% of the rudder were lost due to an explosive decompression of the aft pressure bulkhead. Dutch rolls ensued because of the loss of lateral direction control.
The KC-135 crashed because the rudder power control unit on the rudder was faulty and the pilots failed to identify the problem. They then used alternating rudder inputs to recover which caused the structural limits of the vertical stabilizer to be exceeded its structural limits and separate (along with the rest of the tail).
The Air Transat flight (961) had the entire rudder separate from the aircraft most likely due to stress fractures. This caused the aircraft to have extremely limited lateral directional control which caused the dutch rolls.
I believe even as late as 2007 or 2008, ATC was limited in the deviations it could do due to the track system still in use in certain areas. Once the ARTCC/TRACONs were updated, ATC in the US now has way more capability and capacity to re-route traffic around storms. I forget when the last ARTCC refresh/rebuild happened.
It just confounds me (but explains a lot) that the manufacturer of the aircraft the airlines operate does not share a similar safety culture given that they are in a similar ecosystem (airlines report issues to the manufacturer and the FAA/NTSB all the time)
The only thing that eliminates/highlights issues is time. The 320 and 220 are faced with major engine issues and groundings due to looks at notes not QAing the metal powder used in the sintering process for over 8 years.
But there's always https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YGc4zOqozo
I don't think the public has access to the SRS but the FAA and NTSB do.
Dispatch and route planning (and the fuel that goes into the planning) is really intense and takes into account hundreds of factors including stuff like how much fuel do I need if I can't land at my nominated backup airport and have to go to a secondary backup airport.
Domestically, checked baggage can fly even if you don't. It depends on the situation.