crashmat

You appear to be exactly the kind of person the article is talking about. What exactly makes LLMs have "better" opinions than others?

All American companies pay taxes to America which is basically always commiting atrocities so I don't think that's a strogn enough reason on its own.

Isn't there evidence for neurotypicals only _thinking_ they are focussing better and actually not? Also note that this 'high' you are talking about would likely only apply at higher doses than ADHDers actually get.

I think the comparison was more based on the rooster approaching when they werent looking and stopping when they were. I can't recall any other monsters that do that.

I have grown up on a purely vegetarian diet since I was born and I don't have any health problems from that. I know anecdotal evidence is usually not great and I will admit it is harder to maintain a healthy diet whilst vegetarian (but not too much), in this case it surely cannot be true that you can't live on a vegetarian diet without any bad consequences if I have done that?

probably because when humans pay full attention and think clearly they can not hallucinate for 99% of things they can sense (disregarfing optical illusion), but there is no 'pay attention and dont hallucinate' switch for LLMs.

I think amount of is usually used for 'continuous' (I'm not sure on the word) substances like flour, water, or salt, rather than multiples of discreet objects.

It says because of the airflow from the engine it could be punctured by up to 6 .30 calibre bullets and maintain pressure. Is this enough resilience? (I don't really know about aircraft combat)

noting I have been recommended doas as a more lightweight version of sudo so other people are trying to do this kind of thing

isn't this ungoogled chromium? Or base chromium?

I think it's so they can have one main definition for each base word and then derivatives just link to that

could I ask what kinds of positions the 'extreme American left' takes on issues to distinguish them from the moderate left?

Was it good? Do you have the title?

I don't know whether this is the account you are talking about, but of the second account they discuss an image posted by saying: 'It had originally been posted by a satirical account that generates images of the former president' so if this is the account you are talking about..

I won't deny the BBC has often very biased reporting for a publically funded source.

I don't know whether this is the account you are talking about, but of the second account they discuss an image posted by saying: 'It had originally been posted by a satirical account that generates images of the former president' so if this is the account you are talking about..

I won't deny the BBC has very biased reporting for a publically funded source.