cr3cr3

For a moment I got excited thinking QAT is Intel Quick Assist Technology...

I found it a lot more difficult to read any of the tongue twisters due websites color scheme. For a moment I thought there's an issue with my brain!

It's insane that this is right now on top of HN. Random and really childish interpretation is now worthy of top post?

Lately they do, along with LTE/5G deployments near docks. Still expensive as they often outsource the networking to external vendors/

Thanks, I appreciate the feedback, really. When I type from a computer, during working hours, that happens.

For using ChatGPT, or for still being capable of manual writing in the age of AI?

I consider HN a more serious and knowledgeable crowd, so I try to keep my replies professional and well-reasoned to reflect that. That said, I do like to use AI tools to clean up grammar and phrasing. I also write a lot of whitepapers and technical documentation at work, maybe some of that “leaked” into my response.

DNS is inherently a globally distributed system. Recursive resolvers depend on a hierarchy of name servers—root, TLD, and authoritative—many of which are geographically and administratively dispersed. Attempting to localize DNS strictly within national or continental boundaries goes against the core architecture of how name resolution works.

This particular initiative, while branded as an EU project, appears to be the product of a consortium of private companies, CERTs, and academic partners. In practice, efforts like these often struggle with cohesion, efficiency, and long-term viability—especially when guided by complex bureaucratic processes. It’s difficult to imagine such a model offering a meaningful alternative to existing resolvers, either in terms of privacy, performance, or sovereignty.

Yeah, and http only :) It would be hilarious if it had invalid cert.

I didn't mention ownership and I don't think you should lose it (nor does one lose it really even in this case, legally). But I do think that in cases like these, where there's money involved and YouTube, that they should have the means to prevent it.

Initially I'd say well if you're a public figure and upload your own voice online, of course this will happen. So its something to expect, however, this shouldn't be a problem for Jeff to solve... instead it should be YouTube's problem as they profit from the video monetization. Eventually they'll have to have some kind of detection for all uploaded content.