cowlevel

It's rather ironic that making too much cheap energy makes energy more expensive. I suppose it must work the same way as rent control, where making prices lower makes prices higher.

Except the poorest people traditionally had the highest birth rates.

There are, no kidding, five or ten breaches on front page HN in the last three days. All php2shell, do you think?

And there will be a word you can type into a backup yubikey to make it an identical clone. I.e. a password.

Makes sense. Big business rich people are universally That Guy.

If you put a phone number into Grindr's "forgot password" feature it tells you whether there's an account with that phone number or not.

I would expect it depends on the language. Less unchecked memcpy, more forgetting to check the user is an admin.

How about /48

Oh wait that's the standard recommendation so it's already exactly how you said

Have you got your address tattooed on your forehead or why's it so important to keep it?

So how does an ipv4 host address an ipv5 host that has a 64 bit address

Actually, the difference is how much the ISP gives a shit about you. On a residential connection, they do not.

> our definitions cannot be enforced by technology

... that's why the proposed law doesn't try to?

Is there already a limit? If I reload your web page 5000 times per microsecond, am I committing a crime right now under the current law?

Is a human commanding the computer to do the action?

The proposed text makes it illegal to (not criminalises) running a stealth bot that causes harm that was predictable. This seems reasonable to me. It's legal if either the bot identifies itself, it's harmless, or it should have been harmless (you can't put up a web server that crashes on every 404 and then blame me for crashing it).