cosarara

Joined 8 years ago

Karma
595
Submissions
152
Member since
Apr 4
https://www.cosarara.me

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/cosarara; my proof: https://keybase.io/cosarara/sigs/7pJWXL4PyVRTmH8B29FO1yfecEBnaAguzdm52nolgD4 ]

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 7 months ago
My first idea would be to generate one of those heatmaps using RYS as the base model. And see if it gets meaningfully better. And then again!
Comment · 11 months ago
You can use IgnorePkg in pacman.conf. Things might break, but the feature exists.
Comment · 1 year ago
> Compared to the $8,000 Framework Cluster I benchmarked last month, this cluster is about 4 times faster:

Slower. 4 times slower.

Comment · 1 year ago
But we are not talking about a malicious ssg, we are talking about a vulnerable ssg that somehow needs to be patched. Unless your ssg connects to the internet, this is a non issue.
Comment · 2 years ago
That doesnt help with CGNAT.
Comment · 2 years ago
> I can't imagine how it would be possible to construct a jump call with an invalid value

You can use the bx instruction to jump to any address stored in a register.

> Additionally, what would happen if one of TheZZAZZGlitch's incorrectly reconstructed ROMs was run on a real GameBoy?

It would crash, and eventually start playing the ROM on the speaker, the whole point of the video :)

Comment · 2 years ago
We were comparing the N100s not to the Pi5 but to this $98 Wo-We AMD: https://www.wo-we.com/collections/mini-pc/products/mini-pc-a...

The grandparent comment said you could get an N100 for the same price, but they are all more expensive no matter how you look at it.

Comment · 2 years ago
For x1.5 the price, from what I can see. Are there any under $100?
Comment · 3 years ago
The typical modern gaming PC uses a lot more power than the original xbox. Yes maybe it's more efficient because it's doing "more", but in the end it's one person playing a game.
Comment · 3 years ago
Depending on what you are patching, it will invalidate a great part of the cache, and you will be looking at very long build times for everything in your system.
Comment · 3 years ago
I gave up scrolling the terms and conditions.
Comment · 3 years ago
But not every synesthetic person sees the same colors for every key, right?
Comment · 3 years ago
The rationale would be that it might be more efficient to WASM-decode JXL than to download a JPEG, especially in pages with lots of images, but I would want a fallback if the browser does not support WASM.
Comment · 4 years ago
https://cosarara.me/misc/jxljs/ in my test, it will simply fall back to jpeg, even if the jxl.js library is loaded (scroll down to Image with fallback).
Comment · 4 years ago
Is it possible to fall back to a jpeg if the browser does not support js, wasm, or web workers? With a <picture> element, maybe?

I did some tests on my own server and found that for some reason it's quite fast when running on https, but super slow on insecure http. Not sure why that is, maybe the browser disallows something that's important here for insecure connections.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton