cookiemonster11

It confuses me that people make such a big deal of their little 20 lines of code toy projects.

It should.

There is, in the second sentence of the article.

"Zero, give or take measurement errors." Still does not make any sense. It's completely wrong.

This is not a TCP stack.

This is a bit of a stretch. Chemtrails are a baseless assumption. EM radiation has a measurable effect matter. Why not make valid points instead of insulting people?

WiFi APs do not have a power output of zero. Think about it for a minute, it makes no sense whatsoever.

Also, the device is probably passive, sniffing and logging, but not sending anything. Why would it?

Do you use a mobile phone?

The skepticism is very substantiated. Read John Baez' posts maybe? Or the Paper in question?

It's probably powered by N-rays.