contactdq
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
We're moving past "telephony" and focusing on building more agentic primitives at the telecom edge.
This isn't a recent jump. We've been on this path for some time.
Disagree with you on the customer support side and re: decapitalization in general. People will want to talk to competent bots. We have people literally prompting our AI agents (which are capable of doing troubleshooting) in our shared Slack channels. You simply cannot beat the speed with which they can provide a quality response.
We remain committed to delivering the highest quality product at the lowest possible price point - across all of our product lines.
We've been trying to get on OpenRouter. Just reached out to their CEO. Would be great if people could request it as well.
We're unique in that we have B300 in USA, EU, UAE, and AUS.
Also, building out other agentic primitives like stateful actors (in beta, but will be rolled out globally in the coming weeks):
https://developers.telnyx.com/docs/edge-compute/stateful-act...
Also, if you're doing things agentically, check out AI repo:
That said, you should be able to log into your account without completing the new KYC flow — that behavior doesn’t sound right, and I’ll flag it with our team to review. In the meantime, feel free to email me (david AT you know where) directly, and I can help verify your account manually without using Onfido.
Our mission has always been to democratize access to the power of the PSTN, and we've fought numerous battles (e.g., registered SMS) to make it easy for people to use our services and not be disadvantaged from other technologies (like pre-paid SIMs where no ID is required).
We are constantly trying to figure out ways to reduce friction for legitimate customers while preventing fraud on our platform, but increasingly, and especially with this NAL, we're being forced down a path of gatekeeping.
We don't think the FCC's decision was legally sound. It faces all sorts of challenges, including lack of statutory authority, violation of due process, and illegal rulemaking via enforcement, and we expect to challenge it in Appellate Court.
Pretty unhappy with Fred's post. Easy to play armchair quarterback.
This is not an easy problem to solve, and every step we take is an exercise in Type 1 vs Type 2 errors. Obviously, I think putting innocent people in prison (i.e. the blocking you experienced) is worse than letting a few guilty people free (i.e. bad actors through).
My Linkedin post is here where you can read my full post, replies, and even some legal analysis: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dcasem_vague-rules-strictly-e...